|
[Sponsors] |
March 1, 2010, 05:09 |
calcMassFlow problems
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 111
Rep Power: 16 |
Hello,
I'm trying to use the "calcMassFlow" utility but I have some questions : - Currently, he calculates the massflow every 50 timestep but my case only writes data every 500 timestep. How to change this for calcMassFlow so that it calculates the massflow every 500 timestep instead of 50? - The massflow is exactly 2 times the massflow fluent calculates for the same case (1.34 wheras it should be 0.67). I've made a third dimension of 1 meter because fluents uses a 3rd dimension of 1 meter to calculate its massflow. Where is my problem? Thanks a lot for the help |
|
March 1, 2010, 10:20 |
|
#2 | |
Assistant Moderator
Bernhard Gschaider
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,225
Rep Power: 51 |
Quote:
That utility can only work with written timesteps, so I'm a bit amazed that you get output more often About the factor 2: you're not by any chance using an incompressible solver and the density of your fluid is 0.5? The other suspect is that in the dictionary you've got a scaleFactor 2 (because of reusing that from a symmetric case for instance). Bernhard |
||
March 1, 2010, 13:37 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 111
Rep Power: 16 |
Yep that's this utility
About the rho, I set it to 1.2 for air About the scale it's commented So I don't understand why I get such results ... |
|
March 2, 2010, 13:59 |
|
#4 |
Assistant Moderator
Bernhard Gschaider
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,225
Rep Power: 51 |
||
March 2, 2010, 14:11 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 111
Rep Power: 16 |
Well I don't see where I could have go wrong ...
|
|
March 2, 2010, 15:47 |
|
#6 |
Assistant Moderator
Bernhard Gschaider
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,225
Rep Power: 51 |
Me neither (because I don't know the case). One thing you try is to use foamDataToFluent (see UserGuide) to get data into Fluent and check whether the you get the expected value or the calcMassFlow-value there Bernhard
|
|
March 2, 2010, 16:41 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 111
Rep Power: 16 |
Oh I'll try this!
Thank you! |
|
March 2, 2010, 17:00 |
|
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 111
Rep Power: 16 |
I tried this and I get 0 in fluent so this must be a problem in the conversion.
I made "foamDataToFluent" and "foamMeshTofluent" then I select fluent3ddp and tried to do report-> fluxes -> massflow but that doesn't work ... Normaly it's a 2D case but apparently when I select 2ddp this doesn't work since openfoam works with 3D meshes and specific boundary conditions. Maybe it's because of that ... ? |
|
March 3, 2010, 10:45 |
|
#9 | |
Assistant Moderator
Bernhard Gschaider
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,225
Rep Power: 51 |
Quote:
Bernhard |
||
March 23, 2010, 05:21 |
|
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 111
Rep Power: 16 |
Now that I've made my case 3D, I no more have any problem ... Something had to be wrong with the 2D case, yet I paid attention to the third dimension ...
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Needed Benchmark Problems for FSI | Mechstud | Main CFD Forum | 4 | July 26, 2011 13:13 |
Some problems with Star CD | Micha | Siemens | 0 | August 6, 2003 14:55 |
unstructured grid | sreekanth | Main CFD Forum | 1 | August 6, 2001 16:09 |
Using Fluent for Geophysical Problems | Hassid Samuel | FLUENT | 0 | February 23, 2001 07:04 |
Inverse problems | Aleksey Alekseev | Main CFD Forum | 0 | May 12, 1999 16:38 |