|
[Sponsors] |
December 7, 2009, 15:10 |
QUICK Scheme
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi Foamers,
I am using the LES solver to solve a variable density problem, which is of course not compressible. Anyway, the point is that when I use the following gradient scheme, I get an error of "segmentation fault": gradSchemes { default Gauss QUICK phi; grad(p) Gauss QUICK phi; grad(U) Gauss QUICK phi; } Anybody knows what the problem is? Any help would be appreciated. Maani |
|
December 9, 2009, 10:03 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Niels Nielsen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NJ - Denmark
Posts: 556
Rep Power: 27 |
Hi
The error output would be very helpful. And maybe a better description of the physical problem you are solving.
__________________
Linnemann PS. I do not do personal support, so please post in the forums. |
|
December 9, 2009, 17:27 |
Case under study
|
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 17 |
Quote:
Thanks for the reply. The case is that of a density current, in which a fluid of a higher density is released under an another low density fluid. The difference between their densities creates a shear layer between them and this results in a turbulent flow in common interface. I am using the LES solver (dynamic smagorinsky) plu vanDriest delta, and I have added a code to solve for the variable density there. When I choose the QUICK scheme for the gradient, before the first time step, the code gives: ... Time=0.01 segmentation fault and that's all. You might want to try it yourself!? Any help would be appropriated of course. Yous sincerely, Maani |
||
December 9, 2009, 17:30 |
A thing
|
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 17 |
Well, I forgot to ask but it would be great if you could give me an idea about the following parameters: 1) max cell expansion ratio in B.L. 2) max cell aspect ratio 3) max Courant number
Yours sincerely, Mani |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2nd order upwind and QUICK scheme | Wiroon | Main CFD Forum | 19 | September 17, 2019 04:47 |
Implementation of QUICK scheme | Romuald Skoda | Main CFD Forum | 11 | November 6, 2017 22:20 |
2nd order boundary condition for QUICK scheme | Jafarnia | Main CFD Forum | 0 | February 25, 2004 10:03 |
Quick Scheme | Mikel A. | Main CFD Forum | 2 | February 23, 2004 13:58 |
QUICK scheme | kim | FLUENT | 1 | August 29, 2002 11:16 |