|
[Sponsors] |
September 15, 2005, 05:43 |
Halleluja!
Another one saved
|
#1 |
Super Moderator
Niklas Nordin
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 693
Rep Power: 29 |
Halleluja!
Another one saved by the dimensionality check As you can see from your error message you have incompatible dimensions. fvm::ddt(scal) has 1/s, which means that all the other terms must have the same dimension. However, your sv-term has (1/m)*(m^2/s)^(.5) = s^-0.5, so you should check your terms, they are obviously incompatible, or there is a dimension in w1. N |
|
September 15, 2005, 05:47 |
Dimension checking - does exac
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Gavin Tabor
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 181
Rep Power: 17 |
Dimension checking - does exactly what it says on the tin!
If your scal is dimensionless then when you take a time derivative you get something with dimensions [0 0 -1 0 0 0 0]. On the rhs you took a square root. This is either wrong, or you need a prefactor to this term with the dimensions [0 0 -0.5 0 0 0 0] to be physically correct. Gavin |
|
September 15, 2005, 07:04 |
Hi guys,
Got that, and indee
|
#3 |
Member
Radu Mustata
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Zaragoza, Spain
Posts: 99
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi guys,
Got that, and indeed the w1 should have dimension of s^-0.5. Then how do I define w1 with the right dimension? Thanks, Radu |
|
September 15, 2005, 07:17 |
something like this...
dime
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Niklas Nordin
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 693
Rep Power: 29 |
something like this...
dimensionedVector w1 ( "w1", dimensionSet(0,0,-0.5,0,0), vector(-1,1,-1) ); |
|
September 15, 2005, 07:25 |
I've been trying to see how to
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Gavin Tabor
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 181
Rep Power: 17 |
I've been trying to see how to do this implicitly. The easiest way would be to do this:
solve ( fvm::ddt(scal) + fvm::div(phi,scal) - fvm::laplacian(sgsModel->nuEff(),scal) == fvm::Sp(sv1/scal,scal) ); A more elegant way would be to expand your term to get at least one involving (thing)*scal, and discretise that implicitly. Gavin |
|
September 15, 2005, 07:27 |
Thanks Niklas,
So far so goo
|
#6 |
Member
Radu Mustata
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Zaragoza, Spain
Posts: 99
Rep Power: 17 |
Thanks Niklas,
So far so good. Seems to work fine now. Of course this is just a small part of what I want to do. Will get back later, hopefuly with no so easy questions. Radu |
|
September 15, 2005, 07:31 |
Or use that... hope my math-sk
|
#7 |
Super Moderator
Niklas Nordin
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 693
Rep Power: 29 |
Or use that... hope my math-skills are all forgotten.
grad(a) dot V = div(aV) - a *div(V) and since V is constant... div(aV) = grad(a) dot V hence, fvc::grad(...) = div(...,scal) Henry or Hrv will correct me if im wrong N |
|
September 15, 2005, 08:13 |
Actually, V is not constant, s
|
#8 |
Super Moderator
Niklas Nordin
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 693
Rep Power: 29 |
Actually, V is not constant, since nuEff is in there, V=nuEff*w1, so you cant drop that term.
It'll be something like fvc::grad(...) & w1 = fvm::div(..., scal) -fvm::Sp(div(V), scal) Anyway, im leaving the details to you. You do the math. (hehe, I love to say that) N |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Scalar Equation source term | Merck | CFX | 0 | May 11, 2007 06:30 |
UDS - scalar equation | tomik | FLUENT | 0 | May 17, 2006 05:17 |
The source of user scalar equation | rambol | CFX | 3 | November 14, 2002 08:37 |
scalar equation not converging | hennie | Siemens | 2 | July 24, 2002 05:06 |
scalar equation | Arturo Ortiz | FLUENT | 3 | October 8, 2000 13:36 |