|
[Sponsors] |
ChannelOodles Correcting driving force for a constant mass flow rate |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 20, 2005, 11:39 |
channelOodles:
I'm trying t
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Maka Mohu
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 305
Rep Power: 18 |
channelOodles:
I'm trying to edit the channelOodles to use it for channelDNS. I found some part of the code that is about correcting driving force, this part does not exist in icoFoam, which means: it is either included because of the channel or because of LES? I'm a ware that the driving force in the channel enters in the non-periodic part of pressure gradient, but I do not know about such correction. Can any one explain why we need this part in the channel code or give any reference? Many thanks! --------------------------------------------- // Correct driving force for a constant mass flow rate // Extract the velocity in the flow direction dimensionedScalar magUbarStar = (flowDirection & U)().weightedAverage(mesh.V()); // Calculate the pressure gradient increment needed to // adjust the average flow-rate to the correct value dimensionedScalar gragPplus = (magUbar - magUbarStar)/rUA.weightedAverage(mesh.V()); U += flowDirection*rUA*gragPplus; gradP += gragPplus; Info<< "Uncorrected Ubar = " << magUbarStar.value() << tab << "pressure gradient = " << gradP.value() << endl; /Maka |
|
September 20, 2005, 13:58 |
All to do with the 'channel' b
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Mattijs Janssens
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,419
Rep Power: 26 |
All to do with the 'channel' bit, not with LES.
One specifies an average flow-rate (Ubar in constant/transportProperties) and the pressure gradient is (hopefully slightly) adjusted to keep the wanted flow-rate. |
|
September 21, 2005, 05:56 |
In my case,
I'm interested
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Maka Mohu
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 305
Rep Power: 18 |
In my case,
I'm interested to keep the dimensionless driving pressure gradient (non-periodic part) (scaled by u_tau and half channel width) to be -1 while specifying Re_tau for the simulation. The Ubar can come as a result of the simulation. I think in this case, I do not need the correction step, am I right? On the other hand I was thinking to add this deriving pressure gradient as a source term in Su, what do you think? Many thanks for your help. Best regards, Maka. |
|
September 21, 2005, 06:18 |
Yes, you are correct, I have d
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Eugene de Villiers
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 725
Rep Power: 21 |
Yes, you are correct, I have done this myself.
The pressure gradient was excluded from the momentum matrix for a reason, I just cant remember why. It should be simple to try both options and see if there is a difference. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
periodic, unsteady, non-constant mass flow rate | Lee | FLUENT | 42 | October 5, 2011 16:20 |
maintain a constant flow rate in channel flow ? | Lewis | Main CFD Forum | 2 | September 28, 2010 12:35 |
Constant Volumetric Flow Rate Boundary Condition | Hadley | Main CFD Forum | 0 | October 21, 2005 00:13 |
Possible?: Periodic conditions with non-constant mass flow rate. | Ray | FLUENT | 0 | April 10, 2000 07:10 |
Constant mass flow rate / choking outlet bounardy condition | Min Zhu | Main CFD Forum | 1 | September 29, 1998 16:33 |