|
[Sponsors] |
October 18, 2005, 11:30 |
Hello i'm analysing an airfoil
|
#1 |
Member
Muzio Grilli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello i'm analysing an airfoil and trying to obtain lift and drag coeffients. I used a 2d mesh but I know that OpenFoam treats the mesh as it is 3dimensional so i would like to know if when i calculate the forces acting on the airfoil using the lift drag application i obtain a force per unit span acting on a 2d element or i must consider it as a force acting on a 3d element.
Please answer |
|
October 18, 2005, 11:54 |
Yes, all meshes in FOAM will b
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Hrvoje Jasak
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,907
Rep Power: 33 |
Yes, all meshes in FOAM will be 3-D. For 2-D, the mesh will be one cell thick. If you want ot know how thick it is, have a look at the points file in constant/polyMesh or write a little application asking for a bounding box of the mesh.
Enjoy, Hrv
__________________
Hrvoje Jasak Providing commercial FOAM/OpenFOAM and CFD Consulting: http://wikki.co.uk |
|
October 18, 2005, 12:05 |
Instead of writing a bounding
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Håkan Nilsson
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 205
Rep Power: 18 |
Instead of writing a bounding box application, just run checkMesh and look through the output. You will find the bounding box information there.
However, I don't think this is the answer to the original question - what dimensions your lift drag application gives you. I haven't used it, so I don't know. I just wanted to make sure that you didn't waste your time writing a bounding box application. Håkan. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
density evaluation | raffap | Siemens | 1 | May 23, 2007 17:13 |
HARPOON Evaluation | Tang | Main CFD Forum | 12 | April 27, 2006 15:18 |
hardware- evaluation | Ben | CFX | 5 | November 15, 2004 04:27 |
Fluent evaluation | Baleares | FLUENT | 0 | February 26, 2002 12:23 |
Code Evaluation | Brian Cannoo | Main CFD Forum | 8 | July 26, 1999 03:39 |