|
[Sponsors] |
March 27, 2006, 20:08 |
Hi All
Is there such a func
|
#1 |
Member
diablo80@web.de
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 93
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi All
Is there such a function? It gave me no compilation error, but apparently is not doing what I expected it to do: I thought that if I use vsf1 = max(vsf2, vsf3) it would give the maximum between vsf2 and vsf3 at each control volume. But, when I use vsf3 = to 1 everywhere (actually, I used vsf3=vsf2^0, just to make sure), and print the maximum value of the domain (Info << max(vsf1).value()) it output a number greater than 1 (5.7). Am I doing something stupid? Thanks a lot Luiz |
|
March 27, 2006, 20:17 |
In STL, max (well, that would
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Hrvoje Jasak
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,907
Rep Power: 33 |
In STL, max (well, that would be std::max, but you're using namespace std;) is sometimes defined as a stupid template - try Foam::max instead and see if it's any better.
Hrv
__________________
Hrvoje Jasak Providing commercial FOAM/OpenFOAM and CFD Consulting: http://wikki.co.uk |
|
March 27, 2006, 20:19 |
Forgot to tell you: the functi
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Hrvoje Jasak
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,907
Rep Power: 33 |
Forgot to tell you: the function is defined as a BINARY_FUNCTION(func) macro expansion. For me, it's lnInclude/GeometricFieldFunctions.H, line 260.
Hrv
__________________
Hrvoje Jasak Providing commercial FOAM/OpenFOAM and CFD Consulting: http://wikki.co.uk |
|
March 28, 2006, 01:21 |
Thanks a lot Prof. Hrvoje,
It
|
#4 |
Member
diablo80@web.de
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 93
Rep Power: 17 |
Thanks a lot Prof. Hrvoje,
It didnt work. Here is the piece of code, supposed to print the maximum value as 1. It is outputing 5.7, instead. I even tried to zero the boundary values, as a desperate measure... (what I am trying to do is a v2f turb model, I hope to be my first contribution for this fantastic code... I want to limit v2 to something lower than the total kinetic energy, k) Thanks again. volScalarField v2k(v2_/(k_+kSmall_)); v2k = Foam::max((v2_/(k_+kSmall_)),pow(v2k,0)); forAll(v2k.boundaryField(), patchI) { v2k.boundaryField()[patchI] = 0.0*v2k.boundaryField()[patchI]; } nfo << "\nMax de v2/k: "<< max(v2k).value() << endl; |
|
March 28, 2006, 04:37 |
Just a stupid thought from my
|
#5 |
Assistant Moderator
Bernhard Gschaider
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,225
Rep Power: 51 |
Just a stupid thought from my side, but maybe 5.7 is the maximum of v2_/(k_+kSmall_)) ?
__________________
Note: I don't use "Friend"-feature on this forum out of principle. Ah. And by the way: I'm not on Facebook either. So don't be offended if I don't accept your invitation/friend request |
|
March 28, 2006, 09:28 |
Grrr: pow(v2k,0)! Would not t
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Hrvoje Jasak
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,907
Rep Power: 33 |
Grrr: pow(v2k,0)! Would not that be one? Always one :-) Any number to the power zero is one, right?
Hrv
__________________
Hrvoje Jasak Providing commercial FOAM/OpenFOAM and CFD Consulting: http://wikki.co.uk |
|
March 28, 2006, 09:32 |
Yes, you are right. It was a s
|
#7 |
Member
diablo80@web.de
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 93
Rep Power: 17 |
Yes, you are right. It was a stupid mistake (it was late at night ). I should have taken the minimum in the second line. Thanks. (Actually, there is also a physical mistake in the above implementation, and it should be 2, since u2+v2+w2=2*k, but that doesnt matter to this discussion)
|
|
March 28, 2006, 10:02 |
Yes, I was using a shorter not
|
#8 |
Member
diablo80@web.de
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 93
Rep Power: 17 |
Yes, I was using a shorter notation for dimensionedScalar("1",dimensionSet(0, 0, 0, 0, 0),1).
Now that everything is working (except my case is still diverging, I will change it back to this "1". Thanks. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
udf function!! | shayej | FLUENT | 1 | February 5, 2009 09:37 |
Cp as a function | Mareike | CFX | 4 | April 8, 2008 05:55 |
If function | PANKAJ | CFX | 3 | January 13, 2008 04:53 |
Stream Function - Potential Function coordinates | harish | Main CFD Forum | 8 | June 25, 2005 14:18 |
Max y+ as a function of Re | Fred Uckfield | Main CFD Forum | 6 | October 17, 2001 12:15 |