|
[Sponsors] |
Difference between STAR Ed and Te to OpenFOAM epsilon and k |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 7, 2006, 11:22 |
hello,
i have converted a
|
#1 |
New Member
Michael R.
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 17 |
hello,
i have converted a model from STAR to OpenFOAM. The turbulent kinetic energy and the energy dissipation are assigned from STAR to the variables Te and Ed. In contrast to it OpenFOAM assignes k and epsilon also as turbulent kinetic energy and energy dissipation. They are same labeled in both programs but is there any difference about it? Someone has told me that there ist perhaps a difference and thus Te and Ed are calculated from k an epsilon. If yes, how can i compare them? Is it possible to write out the same in both programs? thanks ahead for all answers. regards Michael |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OpenFoam vs CFX5 mass balance in OpenFoam | tangd | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 33 | May 23, 2010 17:36 |
OpenFOAM users in Munich OpenFOAM benutzer in M%c3%bcnchen | jaswi | OpenFOAM | 0 | August 3, 2007 14:11 |
derivation of epsilon equation of k-epsilon model | Ricardo Rezende | Main CFD Forum | 5 | May 1, 2007 06:38 |
A new Howto on the OpenFOAM Wiki Compiling OpenFOAM under Unix | mbeaudoin | OpenFOAM Installation | 2 | April 28, 2006 09:54 |