Question to the new Version of Spalart Allmaras in 13 -- CFD Online Discussion Forums

April 7, 2006, 12:31	Hi, I have a question to th	#1
andimb Member Andreas Hauffe Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Dresden, Germany Posts: 36 Rep Power: 17	Hi, I have a question to the new Version of the Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model. 1. What is the advantage to use ... + fvm::div(phi_, nuTilda_) - fvm::Sp(fvc::div(phi_), nuTilda_) ... (means phi_ grad nuTilda_) rather than ... + fvm::div(phi_, nuTilda_) ... in the nuTilda equation. 2. What is is the advantage of the new implementation? I wasn't able to find this formulation somewhere. Is it still a kind of a "Low-RE" model. Andreas

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are Off Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Spalart-Allmaras	Kostas Pan	FLUENT	0	March 10, 2009 12:15
Spalart Allmaras	CFD - NewBe	Main CFD Forum	4	June 27, 2008 03:15
spalart-allmaras	Mahmoud	Main CFD Forum	0	June 7, 2007 03:25
one question about the Spalart-Allmaras model?	liuchen	Main CFD Forum	0	March 15, 2007 01:29
spalart-allmaras	david harbage	Main CFD Forum	2	February 20, 2003 20:14

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:36.