|
[Sponsors] |
April 20, 2006, 09:58 |
Hi all, is it possible to set
|
#1 |
New Member
Alessio V
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi all, is it possible to set an outlet boundary condition like fixedValue (=0) for the pressure, but in a way that it can be considered as "average" instead of "in each cell"?. Thank u.
|
|
April 24, 2006, 07:25 |
I'm not an expert in OpenFoam,
|
#2 |
New Member
Javier Ros
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 17 |
I'm not an expert in OpenFoam, just reading the list to get a deeper feeling of the posibiliteies of OpenFOAM.
Tha said, I'll try to give a answer to your question: " Hi all, is it possible to set an outlet boundary condition like fixedValue (=0) for the pressure, but in a way that it can be considered as "average" instead of "in each cell"?. Thank u. " But keep in mind I'm not an expert. A priory the closest posibility to what you are looking for may be to use a dynamic presure boundary condition. That way you impose the dynamic presure as a boundary condition, but to implement you have to define the presure (the one of the navier stokes velocity equation) boundary conditions, by adding or substracting the contributions from velocity and gravity (review euler energy conservarion equation for a fluid without energy losses) to the dynamic presure that you define (if you have it). This condition can be problematic if there is a zone in the outlet boundary condition in which the flow enters the fluid domain, because you dont' know what velocity to use to define presure from dynamic presure (fluent alows the user to define properties when the fluid enters velocity being normal to the boundary, but this produces slow convergence and bigger residuals). This condition is pretty good (in may opinion) if the above condition is fullfilled, and if there are not big energy losses in the fluid close to the boundary condition (viscous effects are small in energetic terms, with respect to potential energy variation of the fluid due velocity changes of heigh change -if there is gravity). This condition, to my knowledge, is implemented (or was) in fluent. I hope this helps. Javier Ros |
|
November 7, 2011, 14:07 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Daniel P. Combest
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: St. Louis, USA
Posts: 621
Rep Power: 0 |
This thread is old, but it came up in my searches quite a bit. An appropriate addition to this discussion is in the thread http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ope...condition.html
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pressure outlet boundary condition | rolando | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 62 | September 18, 2017 07:45 |
pressure outlet boundary condition | Sastry | FLUENT | 4 | February 19, 2011 02:33 |
Pressure outlet boundary condition | jubs | FLUENT | 0 | February 8, 2007 01:27 |
Pressure outlet boundary condition | Rizwan | FLUENT | 1 | March 6, 2006 08:07 |
Pressure outlet condition? | David | FLUENT | 3 | March 19, 2004 05:40 |