|
[Sponsors] |
February 1, 2007, 04:44 |
Hi everybody,
I have a prob
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Vincent RIVOLA
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: France
Posts: 283
Rep Power: 18 |
Hi everybody,
I have a problem with the solver I'm writting and I must admit I have no idea how to solve it. The pressure seems to computed in a write way (I can see it by printing some information on the screen during the computation for each time step), however the pressure file present in each time directory is not writen in the right way. Indeed, the maximum value of the pressure (that I print on the screen to look at the evolution) is increasing, but in each time directory I only find the pressure file that I had at the begining in time directory "O". Then, of course, when I use paraview, I cannot see my pressure or qat least I only see the initial field! Does someone have an idea how to solve this kind of problem? Regards, Vincent |
|
February 1, 2007, 04:53 |
Hi,
I've got a similar pro
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Frank Bos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 340
Rep Power: 18 |
Hi,
I've got a similar problem with the pressure field. When I solve for the flow around a 3D moving object, the velocity and vorticity field are correct. The pressure field only gives me the initial solution or some strange linear behavior. Since the velocity field is correct the equations are solve appropriately, but apparently the pressure field is wrongly written to file. When I use tecplot the same error is present. Anyone any ideas? Regards, Frank
__________________
Frank Bos |
|
February 1, 2007, 05:11 |
Hi Frank,
Your explanation
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Vincent RIVOLA
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: France
Posts: 283
Rep Power: 18 |
Hi Frank,
Your explanation is more clear than mine but it's exactly the same problem. The wired thing is that, if I look to the file Udisp of the structure region, the pressure is well written on the boundary. Did you find a way to avoid this problem? (force writting or so?) Regards, Vincent |
|
February 1, 2007, 05:21 |
No, I did not solve the proble
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Frank Bos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 340
Rep Power: 18 |
No, I did not solve the problem nor did I investigate it in detail. At first I was worried about the solution from the equations, but looking at the vorticity (I mainly look at this quantity) the flow solution is correct. Off course this problem should be solved but at this time I am busy with other things (i.e. learning gridpro).
Has anyone solved this problem of wrong pressure writing? Frank
__________________
Frank Bos |
|
February 1, 2007, 05:56 |
It would be very very difficul
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Hrvoje Jasak
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,907
Rep Power: 33 |
It would be very very difficult to break the file I/O system for only one class in OpenFOAM: all the code is produced from the same templated functions, i.e. it will either all work fine or all be broken.
I suspect the problem is in the code you've written yourself, rather than a standard application, right? There are two possibilities: - you are taking a reference to a temporary field, which gets deleted by the time of writing and memory is re-used by something else (like yours truly, and only last week - goes to show some people never learn) :-) - some other memory violation in the code is corrupting your data. In order to find this, you should run you executable through valgrind and see if there are memory violations. An even better way of handling the problem would be to use a full debug build, which will check for all out-of-bounds array access while the code is running. In any case, it is not the writing that messes things up: I am almost certain the problem is somewhere else. Hrv
__________________
Hrvoje Jasak Providing commercial FOAM/OpenFOAM and CFD Consulting: http://wikki.co.uk |
|
February 1, 2007, 06:03 |
Hi Hrv,
I already tried my
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Frank Bos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 340
Rep Power: 18 |
Hi Hrv,
I already tried my case using the standard icoDyMFoam in combination with your dynamicBodyFvMesh library. The result is that I can use the velocity field but the pressure field is constant or linearly varying (not at all what is expected). Could it be something with the set-up of the boundary conditions. Regards, Frank
__________________
Frank Bos |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UDF for writing txt. file | manu | FLUENT | 2 | December 13, 2007 07:19 |
Errors writing problem file. | Dan | Siemens | 3 | November 19, 2006 10:11 |
Writing to a file | Mike | FLUENT | 6 | June 19, 2005 00:57 |
writing User file | sam | Siemens | 1 | May 31, 2005 16:10 |
Writing ngeom file | Luca D | Siemens | 2 | March 30, 2004 06:24 |