|
[Sponsors] |
SimpleFoam problems with converging maybe skewness |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 14, 2007, 03:36 |
Hello,
is there really noone
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello,
is there really noone who can give me a little hint? |
|
May 14, 2007, 06:04 |
Have you taken fvSolution/fvSc
|
#2 |
Assistant Moderator
Bernhard Gschaider
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,225
Rep Power: 51 |
Have you taken fvSolution/fvSchemes from a simpleFoam-tutorial-case? One favourite for diverging turbulence with steady-state-solvers (at least in my experience) is having another time-discretization than steadyState in fvSchemes.
But that is just a guess. Have you tried laminar on that mesh (just to rule out that this is a turbulence-probleme)?
__________________
Note: I don't use "Friend"-feature on this forum out of principle. Ah. And by the way: I'm not on Facebook either. So don't be offended if I don't accept your invitation/friend request |
|
May 14, 2007, 07:20 |
Hello Bernhard,
thx for you
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello Bernhard,
thx for your answer. In fvSchemes I have steadystate for ddtSchemes, I think this is all which is important, isnt it? I tried to run it as laminar, but it still didnt converge. After 409 iterations I got: time step continuity errors : sum local = 2.58644e+26, global = 2.68736e+24, cumulative = 1.23778e+25 I assume the problem is the mesh, as it got very high values in skewness. So is it possible, that because of this high skewness, the mesh isnt able to converge in OpenFOAM? |
|
May 14, 2007, 07:54 |
Hello again,
sorry, I was w
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello again,
sorry, I was wrong. Now I set up some NonOrthogonalCorrections and it looks like it converges. After 100 iterations the screen in paraFoam looks reasonable in some way. In the former computations with turbulence at iteration 100 I had strange values for p and U. I will check the next iterationsteps to evaluate the results. |
|
May 14, 2007, 08:23 |
Ok,
looks like without tur
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ok,
looks like without turbulence it is fine. Does that mean, that the mesh is proven to be able to converge and the problems are only based on the setup of turbulence? Thanks in advance |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SimpleFoam convergence problems | brahim | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 20 | June 9, 2015 10:09 |
Problems with the RSM in simpleFoam | sberg | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 10 | February 25, 2014 20:39 |
skewness | chouki | FLUENT | 0 | September 4, 2007 11:41 |
skewness | Donia | FLUENT | 1 | June 1, 2007 15:05 |
SimpleFoam convergence problems | schnitzlein | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | June 24, 2005 10:51 |