|
[Sponsors] |
SimpleFoam boundary conditions changed in OF 14 |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 13, 2007, 11:34 |
Hello,
I've got this error
|
#1 |
Member
Ervin Adorean
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 76
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello,
I've got this error in OF 1.4 - simpleFoam with a case setup that worked in OF 1.3: --> FOAM FATAL IO ERROR : keyword U is undefined in dictionary "/home/ervin/OpenFOAM/ervin-1.4/tutorials/simpleFoam/intake-4mm/0/p::p-out" file: /home/ervin/OpenFOAM/ervin-1.4/tutorials/simpleFoam/intake-4mm/0/p::p-out from line 41 to line 43. From function dictionary::lookupEntry(const word& keyword) const in file db/dictionary/dictionary.C at line 146. FOAM exiting My 0/p dictionary: /*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*\ | ========= | | | \ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox | | \ / O peration | Version: 1.3 | | \ / A nd | Web: http://www.openfoam.org | | \/ M anipulation | | \*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; root ""; case ""; instance ""; local ""; class volScalarField; object p; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // dimensions [0 2 -2 0 0 0 0]; internalField uniform 101325; boundaryField { p-in { type totalPressure; p0 uniform 102125; value uniform 102125; } p-out { type totalPressure; p0 uniform 98205; value uniform 98205; } wall { type zeroGradient; } } // ************************************************** *********************** // Can someone tell why it is asking for U, then phi, rho, gamma ... in the 0/p file? Thank you, Ervin |
|
May 15, 2007, 01:17 |
Hello again,
Has anyone had
|
#2 |
Member
Ervin Adorean
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 76
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello again,
Has anyone had this problem with OF 1.4 and simpleFoam - with this B.C.? I don't understand why is it complaining about those entries in that file (0/p). I repeat: the exactly same setup worked just fine in OF 1.3. Anyone? Thanks, Ervin |
|
May 26, 2007, 11:46 |
Didn't anybody observe the abo
|
#3 |
Member
Ervin Adorean
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 76
Rep Power: 17 |
Didn't anybody observe the above described behaviour of simpleFoam and rhoSimpleFoam (for those kind of B.C.)?
What changed from 1.3 to 1.4? Am I making a mistake with the B.C. in OF 1.4? |
|
May 26, 2007, 13:38 |
Sorry for the wasted space. Pr
|
#4 |
Member
Ervin Adorean
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 76
Rep Power: 17 |
Sorry for the wasted space. Problem solved.
|
|
June 22, 2007, 08:17 |
Hello Ervin,
Could you expl
|
#5 |
Member
Guido Adriaensen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello Ervin,
Could you explain how you solved the problem? Thank you. Guido |
|
June 22, 2007, 08:50 |
Hello,
By using this for th
|
#6 |
Member
Ervin Adorean
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 76
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello,
By using this for the p file: FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; root ""; case ""; instance ""; local ""; class volScalarField; object p; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // dimensions [1 -1 -2 0 0 0 0]; internalField uniform 101325; boundaryField { p-in { type totalPressure; p0 uniform 102125; value uniform 102125; U U; phi phi; rho rho; psi none; gamma 1.4; } p-out { type totalPressure; p0 uniform 98205; value uniform 98205; U U; phi phi; rho rho; psi none; gamma 1.4; } wall { type zeroGradient; } } Ervin |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Define non uniform TKE boundary condition in simpleFOAM | qtian | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 9 | July 30, 2007 15:54 |
Rotating boundary simplefoam | gabriel | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 4 | June 4, 2007 04:41 |
SimpleFoam boundary conditions | hani | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | January 10, 2007 03:44 |
Integral boundary conditions turbulent intensitylength boundary conditions | olesen | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | July 27, 2006 08:18 |
Problem about water decreased and boundary changed | Luke | FLUENT | 2 | June 6, 2006 15:54 |