|
[Sponsors] |
Xoodles PitzDaily out of temperature rangepersisten error |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 10, 2007, 05:56 |
Hi in a domain of the scale fo
|
#1 |
Member
O R
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi in a domain of the scale found in pitzDaily, What are the parameters to be chosen in ignites sites in order to ensure a complete combustion.
All is running stable and then an error FOAM FATAL ERROR : attempt to use janafThermo<equationofstate> out of temperature range 200 -> 6000; I saw a lot of people having this error , so far noone has a satisfactory answer the Courant number is normally less than 1.5 and b -min(b)- is bound to be close to 0 (O(e-12)) with a combustion progress of 50 or 60 % What else can be wrong |
|
April 11, 2007, 05:05 |
No one?
|
#2 |
Member
O R
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 17 |
No one?
|
|
April 11, 2007, 10:10 |
To avoid an out of range error
|
#3 |
Member
E. David Huckaby
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 57
Rep Power: 17 |
To avoid an out of range error you might need to reduce your courant number below 0.5. Weller et. al. (Proc. of Comb. Inst. 1998) mention that a CFL < 0.5 is required for stability, CFL < 0.2 for accuracy. This has also been mentioned on the message board.
Are you using a fixed time-step or having the solver select a time-step based on a CFL condition ? To alter the ignition you might try adding additional ignition sites and/or changing the parameters of the existing ignition sites. Dave |
|
April 26, 2007, 04:18 |
Hi
Thanks
one last que
|
#4 |
Member
O R
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi
Thanks one last question how can i do this "having the solver select a time-step based on a CFL condition " till a fixed time step |
|
April 26, 2007, 09:54 |
To satisfy CFL < 0.2 you can m
|
#5 |
Member
E. David Huckaby
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 57
Rep Power: 17 |
To satisfy CFL < 0.2 you can make the following changes to "system/controlDict":
adjustTimeStep yes; maxCo 0.2; |
|
April 27, 2007, 11:59 |
hi Thanks
it is not working
|
#6 |
Member
O R
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 17 |
hi Thanks
it is not working it is like i havent done anything , maybe i mistype something here is my controlDict application Xoodles; startFrom startTime; startTime 0; stopAt endTime; endTime 0.3; deltaT 1e-05; writeControl runTime; writeInterval 0.005; purgeWrite 0; writeFormat ascii; writePrecision 6; writeCompression uncompressed; timeFormat general; timePrecision 6; graphFormat raw; runTimeModifiable yes; adjustTimeStep yes; maxCo 0.2; |
|
April 27, 2007, 12:04 |
Hi,
what happens by using
|
#7 |
Member
Tommaso Lucchini
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 87
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi,
what happens by using maxCo 0.1? Is it crashing at the same point? Try also to tighten the tolerances of the fvSolution by an order or two of magnitude and see what happens. Bye |
|
April 27, 2007, 12:22 |
Hi Tommaso , David
I mean I
|
#8 |
Member
O R
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi Tommaso , David
I mean I am not having control over the Time step, it is the same fiexed tiem step but i am trying all your reomendations during this weekend |
|
April 27, 2007, 12:33 |
Hi again,
the timeStep rem
|
#9 |
Member
Tommaso Lucchini
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 87
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi again,
the timeStep remains fixed because the Xoodles solver does not include the following lines in the time loop. # include "readTimeControls.H" # include "readPISOControls.H" and after # include "compressibleCourantNo.H" also this one is needed # include "setDeltaT.H" Furthermore, # include "setInitialDeltaT.H" Should be pasted before the start of the time loop. Try to have a look to the XiFoam application and then to the Xoodles application and try to put the correct files where needed to set the deltaT. I hope I have been useful. Bye Tommaso |
|
April 30, 2007, 08:07 |
Hi Tommaso,
thanks for your
|
#10 |
Member
O R
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi Tommaso,
thanks for your help i am testing now seems to be working for someone else who might be interested # include "readTimeControls.H" should be placed before # include "setInitialDeltaT.H" too |
|
May 10, 2007, 13:41 |
Hi me again !
I want to kno
|
#11 |
Member
O R
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi me again !
I want to know what is the relationship between these parameters in ignitions sites field: duration 0.01; strength 4; I pretty sure that duration is the time in sec. during which the sparkle takes place. but if I am wrong (please correct me) . If I increase the duration time i also have to increase the strength in order to get the same result , the point is that i have no idea what is the relationship , what is the meaning of strength anyways can someone enlighten me ? |
|
May 10, 2007, 17:04 |
Hi O R (?!?!)
the ignition
|
#12 |
Member
Tommaso Lucchini
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 87
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi O R (?!?!)
the ignition treatment works as follows: for its duration, a source term which is proportional to the strength is added to the equation for b. Have a look at the ignite.H file to know more about that. Bye Tommaso |
|
May 14, 2007, 08:28 |
Hi
I am still having the s
|
#13 |
Member
O R
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi
I am still having the same error FOAM FATAL ERROR : attempt to use janafThermo<equationofstate> out of temperature range 200 -> 5000; T = -736.126 the maxCo is 0.1 (in fact the last max Courant was 0.099034) the last residual for p, Ux, Uy,and k were 2.55e-08,2.44e-08,6.55e-09, 7.5e-10. Something I can not still understand. In the previous time step the min temp either in T or Tu field were bigger than 200 , and in the next time step,(with a deltaT = 8.14815e-08 ) in one point the temperature simply dropped to -736.126 (how could this change happened in such small deltaT and Courant number) and 3 time steps before the error i get Solution singularity for Xi and b , not sure if this is directly related , because I got the same singularity solution warning for Xi in the first Time Step |
|
June 7, 2007, 10:16 |
BUMP
|
#14 |
Member
O R
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 17 |
BUMP
|
|
August 13, 2007, 07:07 |
BUMP !! no one
|
#15 |
Member
O R
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 17 |
BUMP !! no one
|
|
August 14, 2007, 03:28 |
Hello,
I had the same error
|
#16 |
Senior Member
Markus Rehm
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Erlangen (Germany)
Posts: 184
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello,
I had the same error using reactingFoam. I limited the enthalpy as suggested by Markus Hartinger (http://www.cfd-online.com/OpenFOAM_D...tml?1177099819). When I was at a certain stage I could continue my calculation with the (unlimited) standard solver. Don't know if that might help. Regards Markus |
|
February 11, 2011, 05:32 |
|
#17 |
New Member
sebastian fox
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi Foamers,
i´m a new foamer and wondering if anybody has found a satisfying answer to the problem with the error from janafThermo: I´m currently working on a combustion induced vortex breakdown with XiFoam respectively myXiFoam (within this solver i have changed the calculation of the desity to be only depending on the compressibility) . I´m using a 2D mesh (Axi-symmetric geometry using the wedge patch type) and running with low Courrant numbers 0.2<Co<0.5. Anyway i get for both solvers the error message -> FOAM FATAL ERROR: attempt to use janafThermo<equationOfState> out of temperature range 100 -> 5000; T = 99.3763 i have tryed to change Co number, fvSchemes (Crank-Nicholson, Upwind), time step and mesh density. So far, all attempts failed and I don´t find any satisfying answer within the posts been made. So please I would warmly and deeply appreciate any kind of help to solve this problem greets |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PitzDaily example and simpleFoam | csomerlot | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | November 6, 2013 12:20 |
Run pitzdaily with xifoam | tavasoly | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | July 8, 2008 05:25 |
PitzDaily tutorial with Xoodles | christianvhoersten | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | January 11, 2008 11:17 |
How to run the cases Xoodles%5cpitzDaily3D and Xoodles%5cpitzDaily | cfdfans | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 4 | October 18, 2007 04:47 |
Xoodles temperature change without combustion | hannes | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 5 | October 17, 2005 17:31 |