CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Compressible Reynolds Stress Models

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 24, 2007, 07:13
Default Hi all, I'm working on a LowR
  #1
Member
 
cosimo bianchini
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Florence, Tuscany, Italy
Posts: 88
Rep Power: 17
cosimobianchini is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to cosimobianchini
Hi all,
I'm working on a LowReynoldsNumber ReynoldsStressModel based on Wilcox's.
I just have a couple of questions regarding existing compressible RSMs.

1) I guess that laminar behavior and modeling is not affected by turbulence models selections. I mean that a non-turbulent case could always be modeled as turbulent with mut=0. And results should not be influenced by the choice of turbulent model.
So why divRhoR for RSM is returning:

fvc::div( rho_ * R_,"divRhoR")
- fvm::laplacian(muEff(), U)
+ fvc::laplacian(mut_, U)

resulting for a laminar case in

- fvm::laplacian(mu(), U)

that is not consistent with the other two equation models:
- fvm::laplacian(mu(), U) - fvc::div(mu()*dev2(fvc::grad(U)().T())) ?

Might it be a bug?
Possible fix:
fvc::div( rho_ * R_,"divRhoR")
- fvm::laplacian(muEff(), U)
+ fvc::laplacian(mut_, U)
- fvc::div(mu()*dev2(fvc::grad(U)().T()))

2) Are there any specific solvers for RSM?

3) How do you manage (I'm still working with OF-1.3 and I saw inthe new version this problem is oslved) the possibility for R to result non-symmetric?

4) How do you model turbulent heat flux?
divRhoUh does not seem to be implemented in neither Launder&Gibson nor LRR, so they still model isotropic turbulent heat flux. I would like to use Generalized Gradient Diffusion Hypothesis.
So my divRhoUh results to be:

- fvc::div(mut_* 3.3 *(R_ & tgradh())/k_,"divRhoUh")
+ fvc::laplacian(mut_* alphah, h)
- fvm::laplacian(alphaEff(), h)

I found constant 3.3 to be valid for flat plates (Ameri 2002).
Is there anyone who have already done it and could suggest me other expressions?

Thanks a lot for your time,
Cosimo
__________________
Cosimo Bianchini

Ergon Research s.r.l.
Via Panciatichi, 92
50127 Florence - ITALY
Tel: +39 055 0763716
Mob: +39 320 9460153
e-mail: cosimo.bianchini@ergonresearch.it
URL: www.ergonresearch.it
cosimobianchini is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reynolds Stress Models amelia OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 August 11, 2005 18:12
reynolds stress tufito Main CFD Forum 3 March 10, 2005 16:40
Reynolds stress Lee FLUENT 0 September 24, 2002 07:50
Reynolds Stress Models Roued Main CFD Forum 20 February 8, 2000 03:58
Reynolds Stress Models Roued CFX 2 February 7, 2000 11:33


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:15.