|
[Sponsors] |
May 1, 2008, 03:03 |
Dear friends:
I am doing t
|
#1 |
Senior Member
|
Dear friends:
I am doing the parallel computation of tutorial 2.3 dam break. my computer is xeon 3.0 with 2 cores. so i decompose the domain with 2 parts. but i found that the parallel computation is slow that the single core computation. so would you please tell me what is the reason. regards |
|
May 1, 2008, 05:55 |
Hi
The dambreak case is ap
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Niels Gjoel Jacobsen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 1,903
Rep Power: 37 |
Hi
The dambreak case is approx 2000 cells, thus 1000 cells per processor. A thread at the forum states that below 100000 cells per processor does not decrease the computational time, as the exchange of information increase faster than the decreased computational time. (rule of thumb). You are well below the 'limit' of 100000 thus if you increase the number of cells you will reach a point where two processors are faster. - Niels
__________________
Please note that I do not use the Friend-feature, so do not be offended, if I do not accept a request. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Slow down on local parallel | Roger | CFX | 1 | October 9, 2008 18:15 |
Parallel computation | Shrinivas | Main CFD Forum | 4 | July 26, 2007 16:00 |
slow down running in parallel | laf | FLUENT | 1 | April 4, 2007 03:48 |
Parallel computation | Jonas Pedro Caumo | CFX | 6 | December 19, 2006 15:51 |
parallel computation | lenson | Siemens | 6 | April 11, 2005 10:14 |