|
[Sponsors] |
Motion diffusivity solver has problems with patches moving toward each other |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
July 1, 2008, 04:48 |
Hello community,
I encountere
|
#1 |
Member
Björn Fabritius
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Freiberg, Germany
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello community,
I encountered a strange phenomena using mesh motion and solving motion diffusivity. Here is my dynamicMeshDict: { dynamicFvMesh deformingBoundaryFvMesh; twoDMotion no; solver displacementComponentLaplacian y; diffusivity quadratic inverseDistance (dynBoundaryBottom dynBoundaryTop); frozenDiffusion off; } Here are some pictures of my case where you can see what's supposed to happen: The next timestep produces something like this: As fara as I could find out the cells are moved through each other, which shouldn't happen using the laplace motion solver! But I think it's due to the two opposing boundaries moving towards each other and the diffusivity solver works first on the bottom boundary and afterwards on the top one (or vice versa, no matter). I tried different diffusivities, but to no account. My question is: How can I make the diffusivity solver solve for both patches at the same time or what other method could I use? I thought about reading diffusivity from file, making the middle axis stiff, but what are the values I need to provide to the diffusivity file? Your help is greatly appreciated. Have nice day Bjoern |
|
May 14, 2009, 11:49 |
|
#2 |
Member
Etienne Lorriaux
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Compiegne, France
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello Bjoern,
I'm getting the same kind of issue. My problem is slghtly different since i have a fixed boundary (straight wall) and a moving boundary (FSI). Even if i use an inverseDistance diffusivity with the FSI patch, the problem occurs. So i don't think the problem comes from the diffusivity solver working on one patch after the other. I've tried many motion solver and diffusivity models (almost all) without success. I would be interested if you have found one solution or if someone has a hint to deal with this kind of mesh motion. Regards, Etienne. |
|
July 8, 2009, 22:35 |
|
#3 |
Member
Richard Kenny
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 64
Rep Power: 18 |
I had a similar problem but managed to apparently overcome (or perhaps merely delay the onset of) the 'overshoot' by grading the mesh so that it was coarser near the fixed patch and finer near the moving patch. For reference I was using OF15dev, the solver laplaceFaceDecomposition, diffusivity = quadratic and frozenDiffusion=off. Perhaps worth a try.
RGK |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UDF of tube moving with pendulum motion | Esther | FLUENT | 0 | July 7, 2008 05:33 |
modelise the motion of the fluid by a moving wall | samnetmoon | FLUENT | 1 | April 21, 2008 08:06 |
Questions to Dynamic Mesh solver and diffusivity | florian_krause | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 12 | January 11, 2008 22:33 |
Moving mesh forces on patches and turbulence solver | jackdaniels83 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | May 31, 2007 11:29 |
How to set the harmonic motion of moving wall BC | kim | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | September 29, 2005 01:29 |