|
[Sponsors] |
Please confirm current InterDvMFoam capabilities in 2D |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
July 25, 2008, 15:22 |
I would just like to confirm t
|
#1 |
Member
Adam Donaldson
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 17 |
I would just like to confirm the current capabilities of the new dynamic meshing interDvMFoam solver based on some errors that I have been receiving.
While the solver handles mesh motion in both 2 and 3-D simulations, the dynamic mesh refinement/coarsening is only enabled for 3-D cases. I have tried implementing this for a 2-D case, and received an error related to only 6 points being defined for the cells being refined. I know that there are functions capable of identifying when a mesh is 2-D or 3-D, and it would be possible for the adaptive meshing to change it's behaviour accordingly. However, as the tutorials provided only include the 3-D version of the dam-breaking example for a dynamic refinement example, I am assuming that the 2-D capability does not exist. If I am incorrect, and enabling the model in 2-D requires only the inclusion of some parameter, then I would appreciate it if someone would provide some detail on what modifications need to be performed to the dictionary file. Regardless, the adaptive meshing is a feature that has been a long time in coming, and I send out my thanks to those individuals who implemented it and have made it so straightforward to apply. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Capabilities | christianhf | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 19 | November 11, 2010 01:33 |
diff. beetwen current time and current time step | Tomik | FLUENT | 0 | March 3, 2008 08:00 |
How to confirm that OpenFoam runs in 64 bit | jdk | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | February 5, 2008 05:55 |
can you confirm | greg | FLUENT | 2 | July 14, 2006 10:32 |
Please help!! Need to Confirm something -Transient | Julie | FLUENT | 5 | September 5, 2002 13:45 |