|
[Sponsors] |
September 22, 2008, 10:34 |
Dear OF community,
I'm tryi
|
#1 |
New Member
Andrea M.A. Barbera
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 17 |
Dear OF community,
I'm trying to implement a convective boundary condition in OF. Essentially this condition should be applied in a solid domain and should guarantee the coherence of thermal fluxes at the interface between the solid and a hypotetic fluid. This condition should respect the known equation: -k*dT/dn = HTC*(T-T_fluid) Where k, HTC and T_fluid are parameters of the boundary condition (I think to have succesfully loaded them in my BC), and T and dT/dn are respectively the gradient and the value that I must impose. From which BC should I start to obtain my BC? I tried to start from BC derived from fixedValue, fixedGradient and mixed, but I do not know how to impose a linear combination of two fields like T and dT/dn and where impose it. I have tried some tricks: ---- Starting from fixedValue-derived BCs I try to discretize the gradient as (T_to_set - this->patchInternalField()) *this->patch().deltaCoeffs()) getting an equation in "T_to_set", the value that I try to set as BC. ---- Starting from fixedGradient-based BCs I try to discretize T as (gradient_to_set + *this->patch().deltaCoeffs()) + this->patchInternalField() getting an equation in "gradient_to_set", the value that I try to set as BC. Unfortunaley these triks had no results and I get no result, also for some problem related to type mismatch during compiling. I do not know how to start implement this BC starting from mixed-BC or if the trikc that I have followed are reasonable Can you help me? Best regards Andrea |
|
September 22, 2008, 11:40 |
Hi Andrea,
I think you can
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Takuya OSHIMA
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Niigata City, Japan
Posts: 518
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 20 |
Hi Andrea,
I think you can have a look at either 1. the mixed-derived advective b.c. in OF 1.5 or 2. [Advertisement] the fixedGradient-derived convectiveOutlet b.c. I posted here on Sep. 05, 2007. 1. is much more sophiscated but may require a bit of patience to read. Takuya |
|
September 23, 2008, 04:16 |
Hi Takuya,
Thanks for your
|
#3 |
New Member
Andrea M.A. Barbera
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi Takuya,
Thanks for your advise. I will check these boundary conditions and start from them! Andrea |
|
September 24, 2009, 07:45 |
|
#4 |
Member
Jitao Liu
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Jinan , China
Posts: 64
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi Andrea,
I am interested in this convective boundary condition too. Have you finished it? I am study the heating process of a solid, which has several heating channels for hot gas or hot oil flowing through. So the boundary condition at the channel wall shuold belongs to the third-class, just as you described above: -k*dT/dn = HTC*(T-T_fluid) Please give me some suggestions. Thanks in advance. Regards, Jitao |
|
March 4, 2010, 05:36 |
|
#5 |
Member
Bjorn H. Hjertager
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 72
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi Andrea,
I am also interested in implementing the mixed heat transfer BC. Did you manage to make it? rgds Bjorn |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
convective boundary condition | Mani | CFX | 8 | March 21, 2017 10:59 |
convective boundary condition for outflow BC | Pang Shengyong | Main CFD Forum | 1 | August 24, 2007 18:21 |
Convective Boundary Condition | garni | FLUENT | 0 | September 25, 2005 14:00 |
Convective boundary condition | STN | Main CFD Forum | 5 | May 29, 2002 09:47 |
convective boundary condition | frederic felten | Main CFD Forum | 1 | April 25, 2001 02:20 |