|
[Sponsors] |
October 2, 2008, 05:11 |
Dear OpenFOAM users!
I've s
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Matvey Kraposhin
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Moscow, Russian Federation
Posts: 355
Rep Power: 21 |
Dear OpenFOAM users!
I've started verification of OpenFOAM with abrupt area change studies. The goal - is to calculate total pressure loss and compare it with experimental data. I found, that for sudden expansion i have difference 3-15%, which is normal but for sudden contraction difference for loss coefficient is bigger then 20%, this is unsatisfactory. below are formulas for loss coefficients Cf_contraction = dP_tot/(w0^2/2)=0.5*(1-F0/F1) (1) Cf_expansion = dP_tot/(w0^2/2)=(1-F0/F1)^2 (2) where F0 - area with small section F1 - area with large section w0 - average velocity in section F0 formulas (1) and (2) obtained from Idelchik; this formulas has been used for many years, so, i think, they are right for example, for F0/F1 Cf_expansion=0.25=Cf_contraction=0.25 My values are much larger! What i am doing wrong? y+ varies from 20 to 90 in both cases turbulenceModel = k-omega SST with wall-functions contraction case: expansion case Sorry for bad English!
__________________
MDPI Fluids (Q2) special issue for OSS software: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/fluids/..._modelling_OSS GitHub: https://github.com/unicfdlab Linkedin: https://linkedin.com/in/matvey-kraposhin-413869163 RG: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Matvey_Kraposhin |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
time dependent area change | Lijo | FLUENT | 2 | June 19, 2012 01:48 |
Fluent abrupt behaviour | Vaibhav K | FLUENT | 0 | November 25, 2007 01:29 |
Verification | lr103476 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | April 26, 2006 15:45 |
Verification data | Achilleas Tsompanos | Main CFD Forum | 1 | June 19, 2000 13:49 |
Verification using LDA | Bo B. B. Jensen | Main CFD Forum | 3 | June 30, 1999 23:15 |