|
[Sponsors] |
September 27, 2008, 09:36 |
Hello World.
I'm getting a
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Sebastian Gatzka
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 729
Rep Power: 20 |
Hello World.
I'm getting a strange problem with one of my case. It's a wedge geometry and I have used a second symmetryPlane. It's basically a well know setup to the readers of my "bubble in zero gravity" case. It's a relaxing fluid volume after a pertubation. After quite some time there is an error occuring at the intersection of the symmetry Planes. Have a look at the image: I don't know why the gamma field is beginning to break up at this point. Does anyone have an idea? My case is here: http://therealsega.th.funpic.de/openfoam/stwedge.tar.gz Thanks so far! Have a nice weekend.
__________________
Schrödingers wife: "What did you do to the cat? It's half dead!" |
|
October 10, 2008, 01:16 |
Hey People.
I did a quick r
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Sebastian Gatzka
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 729
Rep Power: 20 |
Hey People.
I did a quick review of the problems mentioned above. It looks like the unwanted gamma values are original generated at the symmetry Plane (the left boundary of the geometry). Have a look at the two first timesteps t=0.1 and 0.2 seconds: In the further progress of the simulation the yellow spots are moving to the lower left corner like in the image in my first post. So, does anybody have a clue why this is happening? I'm currently experiencing this problem on a mesh with 60x60 cells. A 30x30 and 120x120 cell simulation doesn't seem to generate this problem. Why does it happen at this intermediate sized grid? If someone wants to have a look at the case itself try this file: http://therealsega.th.funpic.de/open...onWedge.tar.gz Any help is appreciated. Greetings from Hawaii ... (btw: nice spot in the US) Sebastian
__________________
Schrödingers wife: "What did you do to the cat? It's half dead!" |
|
October 11, 2008, 11:00 |
The patch of zero surface wher
|
#3 |
New Member
nicasch
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 17 |
The patch of zero surface where you have the axis of symmetry should be specified as empty (not symmetryPlane) in the blockMeshDict. For any fields in the 0 directory this boundary condition should be empty also.
|
|
October 11, 2008, 17:25 |
Than what is the symmetryPlane
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Sebastian Gatzka
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 729
Rep Power: 20 |
Than what is the symmetryPlane bc for?
I will try the empty bc later. Thanks so far ...
__________________
Schrödingers wife: "What did you do to the cat? It's half dead!" |
|
October 12, 2008, 07:48 |
The plane of symmetry is used
|
#5 |
New Member
nicasch
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 17 |
The plane of symmetry is used when you have a mirror reflection of your domain through that plane.
For axi-symetric cases, OpenFOAM provides a special treatment of the axis through the empty BC. At the axis you actually have no faces (i.e. you have faces of zero surface), so an ordinary BC may not be applied. |
|
October 19, 2008, 12:45 |
Changing the bc from symmetryP
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Sebastian Gatzka
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 729
Rep Power: 20 |
Changing the bc from symmetryPlane to empty made no difference in this case.
I'm trying a different approach to the problem. Maybe a wedge case is not the right one.
__________________
Schrödingers wife: "What did you do to the cat? It's half dead!" |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Overriding Wedge Symmetry and Cyclic BC for a single field | diegon | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | December 2, 2014 01:45 |
[blockMesh] Arcs in wedge case | sega | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 1 | September 20, 2008 12:34 |
Gamma field on boundary patch | tom | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 0 | March 23, 2008 07:56 |
Gamma field initialisation | mer | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 0 | March 1, 2008 09:12 |
Gamma field initialization | Pei-Ying Hsieh (Hsieh) | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 10 | November 10, 2005 11:44 |