|
[Sponsors] |
What is the problem with the relative Flux Correction |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
November 2, 2008, 00:24 |
Hi,
It's important to me to
|
#1 |
Member
Danielle PRL
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 42
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi,
It's important to me to added the MRF in the twoPhaseEulerFoam solver. I added the Coriolis Force in the both equations UaEqn and UbEqn. When I added the relative flux on phia and phib I get a bad velocity Vector direction, but when I retransferred the explecit drag from the p equation to the U equation I get a good result for the vector velocity. In this case the explicit drag is very slow in convergence, so my time step is not limited only by the Courant number, but also by the drag time. Why when I move the drag term to U equation I can get a good result for vector velocity direction ? What you think about this idea to implement The MRF in this solver? I will be very happy for any help. Thanks |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pressure correction problem | richard_larson | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 8 | October 30, 2008 09:48 |
mass flux correction at outflow boundaries | Subhra Datta | Main CFD Forum | 2 | November 24, 2003 14:11 |
a problem about pressure correction method | tommewang | Main CFD Forum | 2 | May 15, 2003 22:18 |
CV flux correction in SIMPLE | Sophie | Main CFD Forum | 2 | April 25, 2002 04:21 |
total mass flux correction for compressible fluid? | Francesco Di Maio | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 21, 2000 05:23 |