CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Wall with fixed heatFlux boundary condition

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree6Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 17, 2008, 11:49
Default Imposing a heat flux on a surf
  #21
ep4
Member
 
Pattyn Eric
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 61
Rep Power: 17
ep4 is on a distinguished road
Imposing a heat flux on a surface is equivalent to impose the normal temperature gradient. (q=dT/dn)

Example:

wall{
type fixedGradient;
gradient 2;
}
ep4 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 17, 2008, 16:06
Default Hi, there is a bc on the wi
  #22
Senior Member
 
Fabian Braennstroem
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 407
Rep Power: 19
braennstroem is on a distinguished road
Hi,

there is a bc on the wiki:

http://www.cfd-online.com/OpenFOAM_D...ges/1/815.html

Fabian
braennstroem is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 18, 2008, 04:34
Default Hello Eric, -> FOAM Warning :
  #23
emilianyassenov
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello Eric,
-> FOAM Warning :
From function Field<type>::Field(const word& keyword, const dictionary& dict, const label s)
in file /home/rkahraman/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-1.5/src/OpenFOAM/lnInclude/Field.C at line 252
Reading "/home/rkahraman/OpenFOAM/rkahraman-1.5/run/tutorials/my_icoFoam/tube_1/0/T::fix edWalls" from line 25 to line 26
expected keyword 'uniform' or 'nonuniform', assuming deprecated Field format from Foam version 2.0.


keyword outlet is undefined in dictionary "/home/rkahraman/OpenFOAM/rkahraman-1.5/run/tutorials/my_icoFoam/tube_1/0/T::bou ndaryField"

file: /home/rkahraman/OpenFOAM/rkahraman-1.5/run/tutorials/my_icoFoam/tube_1/0/T::boun daryField from line 25 to line 39.

From function dictionary::subDict(const word& keyword) const
in file db/dictionary/dictionary.C at line 271.

FOAM exiting
I have put the BC like your example but it gives me that message...
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 18, 2008, 04:47
Default hi to all someone could hel
  #24
emilianyassenov
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
hi to all

someone could help me to how to use that fixedGradient BC?

Best regards

Emo
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 19, 2008, 08:08
Default Emo: Read the error message. Y
  #25
Member
 
Ville Tossavainen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 60
Rep Power: 17
villet is on a distinguished road
Emo: Read the error message. You need to add word "uniform" after "gradient" and before the uniform value.
villet is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 5, 2008, 14:08
Default Hi All, I am new to Openfoa
  #26
Senior Member
 
Vishal Nandigana
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Champaign, Illinois, U.S.A
Posts: 208
Rep Power: 18
nandiganavishal is on a distinguished road
Hi All,

I am new to Openfoam. I have a case where I need to set B.cs given by the equation

-D1*dC1/dn - K1*C1*dPhi/dn = 0 where n is the normal direction.

I am solving a 2d system hence I want to set the flux in the y direction as zero. i.e
-D1*dC1/dy - K1*C1*dPhi/dy = 0
where C1 and Phi are my variables. I am solving coupled equations.

I hope i will get some response.

Can anyone suggest how exactly I have to go about incorporating this boundary condition.

Kindly do the needful.

Thanks

Regards

Vishal
nandiganavishal is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 25, 2010, 04:38
Default fixed wall heat flux BC
  #27
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 17
thomasduerr is on a distinguished road
Hi,

are there any news or hints how to impose a boundary condition of fixed heat flux to walls in OF 1.6?

Thanks!!!!!!!
thomasduerr is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 5, 2010, 20:33
Default Fast and Dirty Boundary Condition
  #28
New Member
 
Vitor Geraldes
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 16
vitor.geraldes@ist.utl.pt is on a distinguished road
One simple way to implement a mixed/Robin boundary condition consists in adding a source term to the scalar transport equation that is zero everywere, except in the control volumes adjacent do the selected patch. This is not a clean approach, but it works quite well.
vitor.geraldes@ist.utl.pt is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 21, 2011, 03:11
Default
  #29
New Member
 
NieYongguang
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 16
nygbook is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by vitor.geraldes@ist.utl.pt View Post
One simple way to implement a mixed/Robin boundary condition consists in adding a source term to the scalar transport equation that is zero everywere, except in the control volumes adjacent do the selected patch. This is not a clean approach, but it works quite well.
Maybe this is a good idea. But if this is multiphase flow in pipe. How do I add the source to energy equation?
nygbook is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 21, 2011, 07:22
Default groovyBC.
  #30
New Member
 
Vitor Geraldes
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 16
vitor.geraldes@ist.utl.pt is on a distinguished road
The best way to deal with this problem is to use the boundary-condition groovyBC. I have tried it in this type of BC and it works quite well. ( please see http://openfoamwiki.net/index.php/Contrib_groovyBC)
vitor.geraldes@ist.utl.pt is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 12, 2013, 17:55
Default
  #31
Member
 
George Pichurov
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 52
Rep Power: 16
jorkolino is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by vitor.geraldes@ist.utl.pt View Post
One simple way to implement a mixed/Robin boundary condition consists in adding a source term to the scalar transport equation that is zero everywere, except in the control volumes adjacent do the selected patch. This is not a clean approach, but it works quite well.
How do I identify the control volumes adjacent to a given patch in order to assign source term to them?
jorkolino is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 31, 2013, 06:35
Default
  #32
Member
 
Peter
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 15
palmerlee is on a distinguished road
try something like this:
Quote:
wall
{
type fixedGradient;
gradient uniform 10;
}
palmerlee is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 29, 2017, 19:36
Default
  #33
New Member
 
Annonymouse
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 9
ben_ is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccless View Post
I am getting the same effect, any luck on this. It seems to only heat up the cells in the proximity to the walls. Basically, not providing any advection of thermal energy into cells next to the ones on the wall. Any ideas on this one?
Hi, Did you ever get a response for this? I realize this is coming pretty late
ben_ is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 21, 2020, 06:59
Default
  #34
New Member
 
Tushar Survase
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6
ttsurvase is on a distinguished road
Use externalWallHeatFluxTemperature in file T of 0 folder.
<patchName>
{ type externalWallHeatFluxTemperature;
mode coefficient;
Ta constant 300.0;

h constant 10.0;

thicknessLayers (0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4);
kappaLayers (1 2 3 4);

kappaMethod fluidThermo;

value $internalField; }


This is for convective heat transfer.

Conductive heat transfer example is described below
wall
{
type externalWallHeatFluxTemperature;
mode flux;
q uniform 1000;
kappaMethod fluidThermo;
value uniform 300.0;
}
I am using OF-v2006 version.
ttsurvase is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ask a question about Fixed Flux Boundary Condition mahe Phoenics 1 July 15, 2008 05:21
match uds boundary condition in wall & wall-shadow pour FLUENT 0 May 20, 2008 09:56
Wall boundary condition – UDF Ssn FLUENT 0 January 25, 2008 04:43
wall boundary condition woytex Main CFD Forum 1 August 19, 2004 08:11
Wall boundary condition Enda Bigarelli Main CFD Forum 1 March 15, 2002 00:13


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:38.