|
[Sponsors] |
March 15, 2005, 09:35 |
Hi!
Is in OpenFOAM a solver
|
#1 |
Member
Duderino
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi!
Is in OpenFOAM a solver for multiphase flow with more than 2 phases (with phasechange/cavitation)? Best regards duderino |
|
March 15, 2005, 09:39 |
Not yet.
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 854
Rep Power: 22 |
Not yet.
|
|
March 16, 2005, 05:36 |
Hi Henry
What does this mea
|
#3 |
Member
Duderino
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi Henry
What does this mean? Are there any plans to do this? Best regards duderino |
|
March 16, 2005, 05:45 |
There are current plans to imp
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 854
Rep Power: 22 |
There are current plans to implement incompressible multiphase flow with interface capturing/VOF. We are seeking sponsorship for compressible multiphase flow which is a prerequisite for multiphase flow with cavitation.
|
|
July 4, 2006, 10:20 |
Hello,
Is in OpenFOAM a sol
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello,
Is in OpenFOAM a solver for compressible multiphase (water/air) flows? Regards, Nicoleta |
|
June 20, 2007, 06:44 |
multiphaseInterFoam. Release 1
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Billy
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 167
Rep Power: 17 |
multiphaseInterFoam. Release 1.4
|
|
June 20, 2007, 08:42 |
Hi,
Based on my understandi
|
#7 |
Senior Member
Pei-Ying Hsieh
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 317
Rep Power: 18 |
Hi,
Based on my understanding, the two-phase solver (interFoam, air/water) is incompressible. MultiPhaseInterFoam handles air + more than two liquids (i.e., air/water/oil). Pei |
|
July 31, 2007, 12:57 |
Hi all,
I've been trying to g
|
#8 |
New Member
Mike Long
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Norman, OK, USA
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi all,
I've been trying to get a 3-species model running in multiphaseInterFoam (air+liquid1+liquid2) and it is behaving strangely. I have all of the alphas set up correctly (they show up in paraFoam correctly anyway). The model is simple with an inlet port for each liquid and a fixed pressure outlet at the far end of the fluid domain. The entire fluid domain is initially air and I am setting a fixed velocity for each fluid phase entering the domain. The case begins to run and I can see each phase beginning to move through the domain, but it crashes after a short time. When I look at the results in paraFoam, the pressure (pd) is small throughout the domain accept in the inlet for the first liquid phase, where it is much higher. I've tried changing the transport properties for all three phases and it still wants the pressure in the first liquid phase to be very high, even when I switch the properties with the second phase. Is there any way to verify that the transport properties for each phase are being used in the solution? |
|
August 1, 2007, 09:47 |
Hi,
If you have all air in
|
#9 |
Senior Member
Pei-Ying Hsieh
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 317
Rep Power: 18 |
Hi,
If you have all air in the domain, then, based on my past experience, run might crash. What I usually do is extend the inlet outwards, and then, initialize the extended portion with liquid. This seems to stabilize the run. Pei |
|
August 7, 2007, 14:50 |
Hi Pei.. thanks for the sugges
|
#10 |
New Member
Mike Long
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Norman, OK, USA
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi Pei.. thanks for the suggestion. I tried to initialize both of the liquid inlets and it seemed to help things along but it would still sigFpe after a short while. I spent a couple of days trying out different settings and looking through posts for interFoam. I settled on using the original PCG solver from the interFoam tutorials (for pressure) as well as using upwind for the alpha terms and it is acting much more stable. The results look strange to me though, especially the way that the liquid phase entering one of the inlet ports seems to be deformed significantly by the gas phase, while the other liquid phase is not.
The transport properties that I'm using are: Gas Phase (red) nu [0 2 -1 0 0 0 0] 1.8e-05; rho [1 -3 0 0 0 0 0] 1.22; Liquid Phase 1 (blue) nu [0 2 -1 0 0 0 0] 1.6e-06; rho [1 -3 0 0 0 0 0] 800.0; Liquid Phase 2 (green) nu [0 2 -1 0 0 0 0] 2.5e-07; rho [1 -3 0 0 0 0 0] 1140.0; I realize that the second liquid phase is significantly more dense than the first but would not expect it to interact so much with a fluid that is 650 times less dense. Any ideas? Mike |
|
August 8, 2007, 14:27 |
Hi, Mike,
multiPhaseFoam do
|
#11 |
Senior Member
Pei-Ying Hsieh
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 317
Rep Power: 18 |
Hi, Mike,
multiPhaseFoam does not have MULES implemented. Standard interFOAM has MULES which ensures boundness. If you can email me the case, then, I might take a look at it when I have the chance. I only have some experience with multiPhaseFoam and this is quite a while ago. Pei |
|
August 8, 2007, 15:38 |
hmmm.. I just tried to run the
|
#12 |
New Member
Mike Long
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Norman, OK, USA
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 17 |
hmmm.. I just tried to run the damBreak4phaseFine case and it crashes when I run it in parallel, but runs fine on a single processor. I'm going to try to run my case with the original settings on one processor (it's going to take a few days!).
Have you run that tutorial in parallel successfully? |
|
August 9, 2007, 10:08 |
Hi, Mike,
You were correct.
|
#13 |
Senior Member
Pei-Ying Hsieh
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 317
Rep Power: 18 |
Hi, Mike,
You were correct. Parallel run failed after few time steps. You should report this as a bug. Pei |
|
August 9, 2007, 10:10 |
Hi, Mike,
Just curious, whi
|
#14 |
Senior Member
Pei-Ying Hsieh
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 317
Rep Power: 18 |
Hi, Mike,
Just curious, which OpenFOAM version are you using? Even the serial run, damBreak4PhaseFine in OF-1.4.1 tutorial failed on me, while, OF-1.4 has no problem. Pei |
|
August 9, 2007, 11:45 |
You are also correct... http:/
|
#15 |
New Member
Mike Long
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Norman, OK, USA
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 17 |
You are also correct... with 1.4 (compiled with gcc 4.2.0) the damBreak4PhaseFine tutorial runs OK. It only seems to be broken in 1.4.1 (compiled with gcc 4.2.1).
I'm going to have to play around with it some more... |
|
September 16, 2007, 18:05 |
Hi there,
The bug report wa
|
#16 |
Senior Member
Srinath Madhavan (a.k.a pUl|)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Posts: 703
Rep Power: 21 |
Hi there,
The bug report was filed and Henry has promptly explained what's happening and how to overcome the problem. Please check the following link: http://www.cfd-online.com/OpenFOAM_D...tml?1189975304 |
|
January 28, 2008, 19:34 |
Any update on Henry's proposed
|
#17 |
New Member
Mike Long
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Norman, OK, USA
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 17 |
Any update on Henry's proposed improvements to multiphaseInterFoam?.. i.e.. MULES
also.. I've been using lesInterFoam with some success designing a simple liquid/liquid mixer ejecting into air, but I'd like to do the same with two different density streams... of course that would mean something like lesMultiphaseInterFoam.. did I name that right?.. ;) Mike |
|
January 23, 2009, 08:53 |
Hello,
I am a new user of
|
#18 |
Member
Virginie Ehrlacher
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 52
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello,
I am a new user of OpenFOAM and I would like to use the solver multiphaseInterFoam to simulate a three-phase surface free flow. Could you please give me some references (if there are any) on the algorithm used in the solver in OpenFOAM 1.5? Thank you! Virginie |
|
January 23, 2009, 08:55 |
Hello,
I am a new user of
|
#19 |
Member
Virginie Ehrlacher
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 52
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello,
I am a new user of OpenFOAM and I would like to use the solver multiphaseInterFoam to simulate a three-phase surface free flow. Could you please give me some references (if there are any) on the algorithm used in the solver in OpenFOAM 1.5? Thank you! Virginie |
|
August 25, 2009, 08:36 |
|
#20 |
Senior Member
J. Cai
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 180
Rep Power: 17 |
Dear Henry and other experts of multi-phase flow, would you please give a comment on my problem shown in
http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ope...lculation.html I think the issue is interesting, but a little difficult. Thank you very much. Best regards, Chiven |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pressure correction in two-phases flow | Noel | Phoenics | 3 | July 23, 2008 13:03 |
multicomponet flow vs.Homegeneous multiphase flow | klarke | Main CFD Forum | 5 | October 10, 2006 23:10 |
2 phases flow system in cylindrical pipe | ivan | FLUENT | 3 | February 25, 2006 12:52 |
two phases flow with reaction | dingding | CFX | 6 | September 17, 2001 09:46 |
HELP!!TWO PHASES FLOW | dingding | CFX | 4 | August 6, 2001 04:59 |