|
[Sponsors] |
February 20, 2009, 14:49 |
Hi everyone
With almost
|
#1 |
Senior Member
|
Hi everyone
With almost all the bounded scheme for alpha, twoPhaseEulerFoam always gives the negative values for alpha in my test cases. The numerical schemes I used are listed below FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class dictionary; object fvSchemes; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // ddtSchemes { default CrankNicholson 1; //ddt(alpha) boundedBackward 0.5; } gradSchemes { default Gauss linear; } divSchemes { default none; div(phia,Ua) Gauss MUSCL ; div(phib,Ub) Gauss MUSCL ; div(phib,k) Gauss Gamma 1; div(phib,epsilon) Gauss Gamma 1; div(phi,alpha) Gauss Gamma01 1; div(phir,alpha) Gauss Gamma01 1; div(phi,Theta) Gauss Gamma 1; div(Rca) Gauss linear; div(Rcb) Gauss linear; } laplacianSchemes { default none; laplacian(nuEffa,Ua) Gauss linear limited 1.0; laplacian(nuEffb,Ub) Gauss linear limited 1.0; laplacian((rho*(1|A(U))),p) Gauss linear limited 1.0; laplacian(alphaPpMag,alpha) Gauss linear limited 1.0; laplacian((alphak*nuEffb),k) Gauss linear limited 1.0; laplacian((alphaEps*nuEffb),epsilon) Gauss linear limited 1.0; } interpolationSchemes { default linear; } snGradSchemes { default corrected; } fluxRequired { default no; p; } A segment for residual is DILUPBiCG: Solving for alpha, Initial residual = 0.000124877, Final residual = 3.70067e-14, No Iterations 5 Dispersed phase volume fraction = 0.22513 Min(alpha) = -5.31042e-05 Max(alpha) = 1 DILUPBiCG: Solving for alpha, Initial residual = 0.000124877, Final residual = 3.70067e-14, No Iterations 5 Dispersed phase volume fraction = 0.22513 Min(alpha) = -5.31042e-05 Max(alpha) = 1 DILUPBiCG: Solving for alpha, Initial residual = 1.3635e-05, Final residual = 1.13321e-15, No Iterations 4 Dispersed phase volume fraction = 0.22513 Min(alpha) = -5.58751e-11 Max(alpha) = 1.00002 DILUPBiCG: Solving for alpha, Initial residual = 1.3635e-05, Final residual = 1.13321e-15, No Iterations 4 Sometimes the Max(alpha) > 1 I have used the low diffusion bounded scheme for both unsteady term and convection term. Why the negative alpha always appears. Any suggestion is appreciated. Regards, Junwei |
|
October 10, 2011, 05:34 |
|
#2 |
New Member
ehsan yasari
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi Junwei
I have the similar problem with my simulation. Did you figure it out how to fix this problem? I was wondering if you could help me. Thanks, Ehsan |
|
October 11, 2011, 07:34 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
ata kamyabi
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Kerman
Posts: 323
Rep Power: 18 |
Hi
This is not an unusual situation. I think these schemes are bounded on a quadrangular and orthogonal mesh. But I think if you use a good mesh with good boundary conditions alpha remains almost bounded. As your results show upper bound of alpha (Max(alpha) = 1.00002 ) has problem not the min of it (Min(alpha) = -5.58751e-11). May be you can get better results with changing BC.s our may be using better initial conditions. Good luck Bets regards Ata |
|
November 18, 2011, 03:35 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Hamed Kh.
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Tehran , Iran
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi su junwei
did u try with smaller deltaT? it has a very important role. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bounded slice in Tecplot possible? | Sam | Tecplot | 1 | August 20, 2008 13:18 |
Calculation of bounded scalars | ankgupta8um | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | June 19, 2006 06:03 |
Question about meshing / solution scheme of CFX | Coriolius | CFX | 8 | August 1, 2004 19:39 |
single liquid fuel droplet combustion(unbounded) | Dipankar Chatterjee | FLUENT | 0 | March 18, 2002 07:35 |
Spectral methods, unbounded region | Igor Antropov | Main CFD Forum | 0 | June 29, 1998 16:45 |