|
[Sponsors] |
February 22, 2011, 03:10 |
|
#21 | |
Member
Tobias Holzinger
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi Patty,
just for completeness. A more handsome way to optimize your Linf might be a FFT of your problem and adapting Linf to a value the main wave length fits into at least once. Quote:
You should increase the cell size (Max ratio 1.2) in the travelling wave direction until you reach something like 10-20 cells per critical wavelength and then let it travel one or more periods. CJA
__________________
Tobias Holzinger Chair of Thermodynamics, TU München |
||
April 25, 2011, 23:23 |
|
#22 | |
Senior Member
Seyyed Ali H.M.
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 107
Rep Power: 17 |
Quote:
__________________
SAHM |
||
April 25, 2011, 23:53 |
Question about how to implement Open Atmosphere
|
#23 |
Senior Member
Seyyed Ali H.M.
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 107
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi Everyone, Thanks for your discussion on waveTransmissive BC, I learned a lot.
Basically I'm trying to use Open atmospheric BC in a Shear-Layer case, and based on the papers I studied (Stanley and Sarkar) I have to use a non-reflective BC for sides and outlet. For pressure I`m sure wave transmissive is a good BC. but for others I have questions. I have tried BCs like inletOutlet and zeroGradient for U, but they don't give a good result. The problem is when I studied the paper by Poinsot and Lele, which you've discussed here, it mentions that we have to use LODI equations to solve for L1-L5 . For variables, like P,V and T we have to solve for their characteristic equations in time based on L1-L5. Also we have to implement zeroGradient BCs for viscous stresses. This is discussed in the paper by Poinsot and Lele in page 115 section 3.2 "A subsonic non-reflecting outflow." For step 2 it says we put for L1 (as I mensioned above) : L1=K(p-p_Inf)and K=Sigma(1-Ma^2)c/L_inf( proposed by Rudy and Strikwerda) then we solve for eqs 9-13 to get values at BCs. My Question is which OpenFOAM Boundary condition is the same as above, and how should I implement the zero gradient terms for Viscous Stresses. If the waveTransmissive does this for all of them (solves the equations for each variable ) how should I describe the BC for U and T in OpenFOAM?
__________________
SAHM |
|
May 2, 2011, 05:34 |
|
#24 |
Member
Tobias Holzinger
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi Ali,
I am trying to help you, but unfortunately this would recommend to much information for a discussion forum. Just relaxing, that is what waveTransmissive does, U and especially T does not make sense since it is an outlet. Concerning your Viscous Stresses problem, I am not the man to ask. Generally I would recommend to read the papers of Yoo and Im 2005, and 2010 (Combustion Theory and Modelling) and Lodato and Vervisch 2008 (J. of Computational Physics) about NSCBCs. Nevertheless we are working on an implementation of these boundary conditions, but it might take up to a year to publish them.... Regards Tobias
__________________
Tobias Holzinger Chair of Thermodynamics, TU München |
|
August 13, 2012, 11:34 |
|
#25 | |
New Member
M K Singh
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 17 |
Quote:
I am wondering if you already published your boundary conditions what you have mentioned in your post. If yes, could you please send me a link or copy of the article. Thanks in advance. M K Singh |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pressure driven laminar flow simpleFoam pressure higher at the outlet than inlet | gabriel | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 16 | September 30, 2009 19:20 |
Transmissive Outflow Boundary Condition | J | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 18, 2006 12:59 |
Forcing pressure outlet according to pressure prob | Cedric | FLUENT | 0 | July 29, 2005 12:49 |
Transmissive outflow. | Fluids | Main CFD Forum | 1 | July 21, 2004 06:07 |
pressure driven flow by pressure correction method | justentered | Main CFD Forum | 0 | December 30, 2003 00:52 |