CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Sandia Flame F

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 20, 2024, 10:46
Default Sandia Flame F
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2024
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 2
Lizz4rd is on a distinguished road
Good Day,
i tried simulating the Sandia Flame F.
According to this Paper: https://tcg.mae.cornell.edu/pubs/Xu_P_CF_00.pdf (Page 288/289)

for this case, all the fractions stay the same. Only the velocity in the Main Inlet changes to 99.2, in the Pilot Jet to 22.8 and the Temperature in the Pilot jet changes to 1860K. The rest is copied from the tutorial.



When simulating this case, there is no ignition (as can be seen in the Picture - at 5500s)


Does somebody know what i need to change to get this simulation running.

Thank you very much
Attached Images
File Type: jpg SandiaFlameF.jpg (26.1 KB, 9 views)
Lizz4rd is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 27, 2024, 13:27
Default
  #2
Member
 
godfatherBond's Avatar
 
Maximus Arelius
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Morocco
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 9
godfatherBond is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lizz4rd View Post
Good Day,
i tried simulating the Sandia Flame F.
According to this Paper: https://tcg.mae.cornell.edu/pubs/Xu_P_CF_00.pdf (Page 288/289)

for this case, all the fractions stay the same. Only the velocity in the Main Inlet changes to 99.2, in the Pilot Jet to 22.8 and the Temperature in the Pilot jet changes to 1860K. The rest is copied from the tutorial.



When simulating this case, there is no ignition (as can be seen in the Picture - at 5500s)


Does somebody know what i need to change to get this simulation running.

Thank you very much
Hello,
1. May I know what combustion model are you using? Were you able to run Flame D successfully? Not sure if the combustion model is active from the plots shown above. I see not jet or its almost broken up only a few mm from the exit plane.
2. Flame F is a challenging flame if you want to reproduce local extinction. Else it keeps on burning quite well.
3. The model from Pope used a lower temperature to get the local extinction.
4. You may see this recent article on Sandia Flames by our allied group for more details on how flame F should look like.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...10218021006155
godfatherBond is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 28, 2024, 15:03
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2024
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 2
Lizz4rd is on a distinguished road
1) I ran all Configurations from A to F (in the Picture you can see all cases at 7250 s). For the combustion, I use the Jones Lindstedt mechanism.

Chemistry is automatically switched on in the Allrun file:
Code:
#!/bin/sh
cd ${0%/*} || exit 1    # Run from this directory

# Source tutorial run functions
. $WM_PROJECT_DIR/bin/tools/RunFunctions

# Set application name
application=$(getApplication)

runApplication chemkinToFoam \
               chemkin/jones_lindstedt.dat chemkin/thermo30.dat chemkin/transportProperties \
               constant/reactionsJL constant/thermo.compressibleGasJL

runApplication -o blockMesh
runApplication -o setFields

# Run the application without chemistry until 1500 to let the flow develop
runApplication -o foamDictionary -entry "startFrom" -set "startTime" system/controlDict
runApplication -a foamDictionary -entry "startTime" -set "0" system/controlDict
runApplication -a foamDictionary -entry "writeInterval" -set "500" system/controlDict
runApplication -a foamDictionary -entry "stopAt" -set "endTime" system/controlDict
runApplication -a foamDictionary -entry "endTime" -set "1500" system/controlDict
runApplication -a foamDictionary -entry "chemistry" -set "off" constant/chemistryProperties

runApplication -o -s "foam" $application

# Run with chemistry until flame reach its full size
runApplication -a foamDictionary -entry "startFrom" -set "latestTime" system/controlDict
runApplication -a foamDictionary -entry "writeInterval" -set "250" system/controlDict
runApplication -a foamDictionary -entry "endTime" -set "7250" system/controlDict
runApplication -a foamDictionary -entry "chemistry" -set "on" constant/chemistryProperties

runApplication -a -s "foam" $application
For all the cases, the composition of the mixture is the same:
Jet: 0.1561 CH4, 0.1966 O2, 0.6473 N2
Pilot: 0 CH4, 0.054 O2, 0.7342 N2, 0.1098 CO2, 0.000129 H2, 0.000747 O, 0.0000248 H, 0.0942 H2O, 0.00407 CO, 0.0028 OH
Coflow: 0.77 N2, 0.23 O2


The velocity differs:

Flame Jet Pilot Coflow
A 2.44 - 0.9
B 18.2 6.8 0.9
C 2.44 6.8 0.9
D 2.44 11.4 0.9
E 2.44 17.1 0.9
F 2.44 22.8 0.9
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Cases.jpg (55.0 KB, 7 views)
Lizz4rd is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 28, 2024, 19:57
Default
  #4
Member
 
godfatherBond's Avatar
 
Maximus Arelius
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Morocco
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 9
godfatherBond is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lizz4rd View Post
1) I ran all Configurations from A to F (in the Picture you can see all cases at 7250 s). For the combustion, I use the Jones Lindstedt mechanism.

Chemistry is automatically switched on in the Allrun file:
Code:
#!/bin/sh
cd ${0%/*} || exit 1    # Run from this directory

# Source tutorial run functions
. $WM_PROJECT_DIR/bin/tools/RunFunctions

# Set application name
application=$(getApplication)

runApplication chemkinToFoam \
               chemkin/jones_lindstedt.dat chemkin/thermo30.dat chemkin/transportProperties \
               constant/reactionsJL constant/thermo.compressibleGasJL

runApplication -o blockMesh
runApplication -o setFields

# Run the application without chemistry until 1500 to let the flow develop
runApplication -o foamDictionary -entry "startFrom" -set "startTime" system/controlDict
runApplication -a foamDictionary -entry "startTime" -set "0" system/controlDict
runApplication -a foamDictionary -entry "writeInterval" -set "500" system/controlDict
runApplication -a foamDictionary -entry "stopAt" -set "endTime" system/controlDict
runApplication -a foamDictionary -entry "endTime" -set "1500" system/controlDict
runApplication -a foamDictionary -entry "chemistry" -set "off" constant/chemistryProperties

runApplication -o -s "foam" $application

# Run with chemistry until flame reach its full size
runApplication -a foamDictionary -entry "startFrom" -set "latestTime" system/controlDict
runApplication -a foamDictionary -entry "writeInterval" -set "250" system/controlDict
runApplication -a foamDictionary -entry "endTime" -set "7250" system/controlDict
runApplication -a foamDictionary -entry "chemistry" -set "on" constant/chemistryProperties

runApplication -a -s "foam" $application
For all the cases, the composition of the mixture is the same:
Jet: 0.1561 CH4, 0.1966 O2, 0.6473 N2
Pilot: 0 CH4, 0.054 O2, 0.7342 N2, 0.1098 CO2, 0.000129 H2, 0.000747 O, 0.0000248 H, 0.0942 H2O, 0.00407 CO, 0.0028 OH
Coflow: 0.77 N2, 0.23 O2


The velocity differs:

Flame Jet Pilot Coflow
A 2.44 - 0.9
B 18.2 6.8 0.9
C 2.44 6.8 0.9
D 2.44 11.4 0.9
E 2.44 17.1 0.9
F 2.44 22.8 0.9



1. Not all information to go ahead, but I guess it has something to do with the temporal discretization scheme.
2. I never ran a steady state solver for combustion, so cannot comment on that. But from the results the low Re flames are burning. So, D-F do not burn??
Also, whats going on with Flame A??
3. Can you change the temporal discretization to switch to URANS??
ddtSchemes
{
default localEuler;
}


to



ddtSchemes
{
defaultbackward;
}


__________________
--
🃏Maximus🃏
godfatherBond is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 2, 2024, 09:21
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2024
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 2
Lizz4rd is on a distinguished road
Hi, thank you for the suggestion.
Sadly, when switching default backward, I didn't get a solution because the temperature was out of bound.
Quote:
--> FOAM Warning :
From function Foam::scalar Foam::janafThermo<EquationOfState>::limit(Foam::sc alar) const [with EquationOfState = Foam:erfectGas<Foam::specie>; Foam::scalar = double]
in file /home/ubuntu/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-11/src/thermophysicalModels/specie/lnInclude/janafThermoI.H at line 117
attempt to use janafThermo<EquationOfState> out of temperature range 250 -> 3000; T = 1.475681464e+24
When I'm switching to the Gri_mech 3.0 mechanism, who is used in the tutorial, the D-Flame works. But flames A and F still dont work.


With flame configuration A, I generally don't understand how this flame is supposed to burn without a coflame.

Last edited by Lizz4rd; May 4, 2024 at 06:27.
Lizz4rd is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sandia Flame D with C2H4 (Ethylene) Amirreza_pro OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 8 September 16, 2022 07:32
Sandia Flame D OpenFoam tutorial case - bad result? Brandani OpenFOAM Programming & Development 8 January 18, 2022 13:29
[ANSYS Meshing] 2D Mesh for Sandia Flame D FlameKan ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 2 February 21, 2019 21:43
How to set the Reynolds number up for a turbulent Jet flame (Sandia D) miri OpenFOAM 0 May 24, 2015 10:38
Modeling the Sandia flame D with EDC Christoph_84 FLUENT 1 September 18, 2011 20:24


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:11.