|
[Sponsors] |
March 13, 2024, 06:56 |
simpleFoam
|
#1 |
New Member
onurlands
Join Date: Feb 2024
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 2 |
Hello, I am performing aerodynamic analysis for external flow. I get results that are far from the drag values I need. I use the K-W SST model. Since I work at 100m/s, my kinetic energy and omega values are very high. I think there is no error in my case file, but my results are very high. Can you help me with this?
|
|
March 13, 2024, 14:05 |
|
#2 |
Member
Shravan
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 75
Rep Power: 9 |
Hello,
Check out these recent threads Unable to validate Drag coefficient for Flow past a sphere using OpenFOAM Drag coefficient of sphere & spherical bubble at Re = 1 For drag the most common reason is the mesh refinement near the wall in order to capture the boundary layer accurately. It should be well refined. Since you use RANS turbulence modelling, the mesh spacing at the walls should be related to the y+ values. If you use wall functions, y+ should be between 30 and 100. If you don’t use wall functions (low Re turbulence models), y+ should be less than 5. A suggestion: Please name your thread better (relevant name) next time so that people in future can find it easily Thanks |
|
Tags |
simplefoam |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
simpleFoam tutorial PitzDaily using Reynolds stress tensor (LRR RASModel) | dlahaye | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 24 | August 4, 2023 15:29 |
interFoam vs. simpleFoam channel flow comparison | DanM | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 12 | January 31, 2020 16:26 |
simpleFoam parallel solver & Fluent polyhedral mesh | Zlatko | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | September 26, 2014 07:53 |
Laminar simpleFoam and inviscid simpleFoam | herenger | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 7 | July 11, 2013 07:27 |
Trying to run a benchmark case with simpleFoam | spsb | OpenFOAM | 3 | February 24, 2012 10:07 |