CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

External incident radiation

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 11, 2024, 16:13
Default External incident radiation
  #1
New Member
 
Timothy
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 3
superlegit is on a distinguished road
Hi,

Using buoyantSimpleFoam and the fvDOM model for radiation, I was trying to model a wall that received an external heat flux and external radiative heat flux. I applied the external wall heat flux BC for temperature:

type externalWallHeatFluxTemperature;
mode coefficient;
h 4.76;
Ta 306;
kappaMethod fluidThermo;
qr qr;

For radiative intensity I, I used the grey diffusive condition with an external incident radiation

type greyDiffusiveRadiation;
qRadExt 350;

The results were really weird, however. The wall temperature, which was initially at 306k, decreased significantly despite there being incident radiation. The results looked much better when I omitted the qr term from the temperature BC. The results also looked a lot better when I created a file for qr in the 0 folder and applied this BC meant for the viewFactor model

type greyDiffusiveRadiationViewFactor;
qro 350;

Nevertheless, I was wondering if this was the right way of modelling an external radiative flux. Also, if I leave the qr BC in but remove the qRadExt from the IDefault BC, it becomes as though there was no external radiative flux at all.

Thank you
superlegit is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 11, 2024, 16:35
Default External incident radiation vs external heat flux
  #2
New Member
 
Timothy
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 3
superlegit is on a distinguished road
Also, I was wondering the difference between applying an external heat flux at a wall as opposed to applying an external radiative flux at a wall. I.e.,

Case 1:
For temperature,
type externalWallHeatFluxTemperature;
mode flux;
q 350;
kappaMethod fluidThermo;

Case 2:
(Using FvDOM)
For radiative intensity I,

type greyDiffusiveRadiation;
qRadExt 350;

The results I get are very different. For case 1, temperatures can increase by up to 50K. For case 2, the temperature does not increase by more than 3-4K
superlegit is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
buoyantsimplefoam, radiation fvdom, radiative heat flux


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Difference between External and Internal flow radiation problems Kummi FLUENT 0 April 10, 2018 04:06
Fluent Radiation/porous media Schmitt pierre-Louis FLUENT 26 September 1, 2016 11:29
Monte Carlo Simulation: H-Energy is not convergating & high Incident Radiation volleyHC CFX 5 April 3, 2016 06:41
CGNS Compiling Diego Main CFD Forum 17 December 21, 2014 02:40
Fluent incident radiation problem Michael Schwarz Main CFD Forum 0 October 21, 1999 06:56


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:49.