CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

kepsilon and komehga in OpenFOAM

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 8, 2024, 19:48
Default kepsilon and komehga in OpenFOAM
  #1
Member
 
Anurag
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 78
Rep Power: 3
anubasu is on a distinguished road
Hi all,

I am simulating partially filled pipe flows using interFOAM. Which turbulence model is best to use? ke or komega?

Thanks
anubasu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 9, 2024, 04:03
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Saeed Jamshidi
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 214
Rep Power: 8
saeed jamshidi is on a distinguished road
Hello anubasu,

As far as I know, k epsilon turbulence medel is the best choice for confined flows such as flow inside a pipe or channel. Besides, use suitable y plus and wall functions for your problem.

Good luck.
saeed jamshidi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 9, 2024, 14:07
Default
  #3
Member
 
Anurag
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 78
Rep Power: 3
anubasu is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by saeed jamshidi View Post
Hello anubasu,

As far as I know, k epsilon turbulence medel is the best choice for confined flows such as flow inside a pipe or channel. Besides, use suitable y plus and wall functions for your problem.

Good luck.
Hi saeed, ok thanks. I think it is best to compare the results using the 2 turbulence models.
anubasu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 9, 2024, 14:33
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Saeed Jamshidi
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 214
Rep Power: 8
saeed jamshidi is on a distinguished road
Allright, this would be more interesting approach.

Please, share your results for us to make comparison.

Tnx.
saeed jamshidi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 9, 2024, 19:53
Default
  #5
Member
 
Anurag
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 78
Rep Power: 3
anubasu is on a distinguished road
Hi everyone,

I am a bit confused. For ke turbulence model y+ should be around 30, but do we need to give inflation layers? I am modeling fully turbulent partially-filled pipe flow using interFOAM. If without inflation layers I can get y+ around 30 is it not sufficient? I am a bit confused. ALso for komega, y+ should be around 1, so for that is inflation layer required?

Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks.
anubasu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 10, 2024, 09:41
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: UK
Posts: 747
Rep Power: 14
Tobermory will become famous soon enough
Your question does not make any sense. You need to ensure that :

1. your mesh size is appropriate in all of the areas of the domain ... including at the wall;
2. the variation in cell size is suitably low, to minimise artificial diffusion effects.

How you achieve the above - with or without "inflation" layers - is entirely up to you.
Tobermory is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 10, 2024, 16:12
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Arjun
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Nurenberg, Germany
Posts: 1,290
Rep Power: 34
arjun will become famous soon enougharjun will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by anubasu View Post
Hi everyone,

I am a bit confused. For ke turbulence model y+ should be around 30, but do we need to give inflation layers? I am modeling fully turbulent partially-filled pipe flow using interFOAM. If without inflation layers I can get y+ around 30 is it not sufficient? I am a bit confused. ALso for komega, y+ should be around 1, so for that is inflation layer required?

Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks.



This whole thing can be really confusing. In general there are three possibilities.



For turbulence models usually the values of epsilon or omega are set based on where the first cell near to wall is. (that is it is dependent on yplus and local turbulence Reynolds number).





Now there are three possibilities. The yplus is 5 or less or yplus is 30 or more and then third yplus is between 5 to 30.



First two cases (yplus < 5 and yplus > 30) we have clear formulas available and that can be used.



In the buffer that is between 5 to 30 there is a blending applied and the values are very sensitive to this blending.



The problem is that no one has perfect formula for it and this area is hit or miss.



So best is to avoid it. So use either yplus of 5 or less or 30 or more where we know what to be done.
arjun is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 10, 2024, 16:21
Default
  #8
Member
 
Anurag
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 78
Rep Power: 3
anubasu is on a distinguished road
Thanks everyone, I will try to read further.
anubasu is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:22.