|
[Sponsors] |
December 14, 2023, 19:01 |
Heat transfer at a droplet phase boundary
|
#1 |
New Member
Fabian
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Europe
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 5 |
Hey everybody,
I am looking for some help for a droplet simulation: I want to place a water droplet inside an air flow. The droplet should be non-moving and non-deforming, while the air phase has a relative velocity towards the droplet. First of all, the goal is to investigate the heat flux on the phase boundary. In my first try, I use a single mesh (droplet and its surrounding is meshed), in which I patch the alpha value for the water droplet and its temperature. Additionaly, i separated both phases with a wall from each other. The shear stress on the phase boundary shall be neglectible first. Now to my questions: 1. Is there a better way to implement a non-moving rigid droplet inside a flow? 2. I am currently missing a suitable boundary condition for my heat flux on the phase boundary due to the wall type boundary. In my case, I would need to get my temperature gradient between the cells on both sides of the wall facing each other and then I could calculate my heat flux for each face. Is there a boundary condition which i can use/ easily change or do I have to code one from scratch? If I have to code a new one, where can I implement the heat flux on the specific faces, so it is considered in the energy equation? Thank you very much in advance. Best regards! |
|
Tags |
boundary condition t, droplet flow, multiphase heat transfer |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Error - Solar absorber - Solar Thermal Radiation | MichaelK | CFX | 12 | September 1, 2016 06:15 |
Basic Nozzle-Expander Design | karmavatar | CFX | 20 | March 20, 2016 09:44 |
Problem in setting Boundary Condition | Madhatter92 | CFX | 12 | January 12, 2016 05:39 |
Question about heat transfer coefficient setting for CFX | Anna Tian | CFX | 1 | June 16, 2013 07:28 |
CFX doesn't continue calculation... | mactech001 | CFX | 6 | November 15, 2009 22:25 |