|
[Sponsors] |
Why isn't the Kunz model in OpenFOAM 3-phase following the 20O0 reference paper? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
August 14, 2023, 06:32 |
Why isn't the Kunz model in OpenFOAM 3-phase following the 20O0 reference paper?
|
#1 |
New Member
spacecat
Join Date: Jul 2023
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi,
I was reading the OpenFOAM cavitation Kunz model reference paper and if I did not misunderstand, the paper talks about 3-phase flow (liquid, vapor, and non-condensable gas). Yet, when I looked at the modelled equations in the solver code in OpenFOAM v10 for the Kunz model it seems to be 2-phase flow. Is there a reason why OpenFOAM does not employ the 3-phase flow Kunz model? Thank you very much in advance! |
|
August 20, 2023, 08:02 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Humberto
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Brasil
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 5 |
I don't know that article, but in the whole HEM formulation, it assumes a non-condensable gas. However, when a non-condensable gas is present, it slows down cavitation. Additionally, for stability, it's often assumed that the pressure of the non-condensable gas is equal to the gas pressure. Maybe OpenFoam assumes that within a certain pressure range, all the gas can cavitate without the influence of another phase.
|
|
Tags |
3-phase, cavitation, kunz |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What are the best settings for a channel flow simulation? | Ashkan Kashani | CFX | 3 | October 13, 2022 22:36 |
Recommendation of paper for Reynolds Stress Model | FluidKo | Main CFD Forum | 7 | February 10, 2022 09:57 |
[swak4Foam] swakExpression not writing to log | alexfells | OpenFOAM Community Contributions | 3 | March 16, 2020 19:19 |
OpenFOAM 1.6 ext - Compilation errors - Fedora 17(32bit) | toolpost | OpenFOAM Installation | 15 | September 21, 2012 10:38 |
error message | cuteapathy | CFX | 14 | March 20, 2012 07:45 |