|
[Sponsors] |
pisoFoam stops at first iteration without error message |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 31, 2023, 10:00 |
pisoFoam stops at first iteration without error message
|
#1 |
Member
Giorgio
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 55
Rep Power: 3 |
I am performing a pisoFoam simulation using the kOmega turbulence model. The simulation stops after the very first iteration without any error message, with very small residuals.
Here is the output: Code:
/*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*\ | ========= | | | \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox | | \\ / O peration | Version: 2212 | | \\ / A nd | Website: www.openfoam.com | | \\/ M anipulation | | \*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ Build : _fd8c5e00-20221221 OPENFOAM=2212 version=2212 Arch : "LSB;label=32;scalar=64" Exec : pisoFoam Date : Mar 31 2023 Time : 14:24:22 Host : L91031534 PID : 28339 I/O : uncollated Case : /home/giorgio/OpenFOAM/2212/cfd/GrigliaPiramidi nProcs : 1 trapFpe: Floating point exception trapping enabled (FOAM_SIGFPE). fileModificationChecking : Monitoring run-time modified files using timeStampMaster (fileModificationSkew 5, maxFileModificationPolls 20) allowSystemOperations : Allowing user-supplied system call operations // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // Create time Create mesh for time = 0 PISO: Operating solver in PISO mode Reading field p Reading field U Reading/calculating face flux field phi Selecting incompressible transport model Newtonian Selecting turbulence model type RAS Selecting RAS turbulence model kOmega RAS { RASModel kOmega; turbulence on; printCoeffs on; betaStar 0.09; beta 0.072; gamma 0.52; alphaK 0.5; alphaOmega 0.5; } No MRF models present No finite volume options present Starting time loop Time = 1e-05 Courant Number mean: 1.29184e-07 max: 9.69034e-06 smoothSolver: Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 2.88595e-07, No Iterations 1 smoothSolver: Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 4.20929e-07, No Iterations 1 smoothSolver: Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 3.71605e-07, No Iterations 1 GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 0.0869702, No Iterations 14 GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.243386, Final residual = 0.0113372, No Iterations 1 time step continuity errors : sum local = 8.55951e-07, global = 1.08964e-09, cumulative = 1.08964e-09 GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.0356773, Final residual = 0.00255993, No Iterations 1 GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.00842964, Final residual = 0.000497795, No Iterations 2 time step continuity errors : sum local = 4.70351e-08, global = 1.57383e-09, cumulative = 2.66347e-09 GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.00520673, Final residual = 0.000451653, No Iterations 1 GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.00504492, Final residual = 8.85867e-07, No Iterations 23 time step continuity errors : sum local = 8.45234e-11, global = -2.13953e-12, cumulative = 2.66133e-09 The quality of the mesh is quite bad though. I am not sure the problem is that, in any case, the fact that stops without warnings and with small residuals is suspect. Here is the output of checkMesh: Code:
Mesh stats points: 4167670 faces: 36483185 internal faces: 35297638 cells: 17092207 faces per cell: 4.19962 boundary patches: 4 point zones: 0 face zones: 0 cell zones: 0 Overall number of cells of each type: hexahedra: 0 prisms: 3392213 wedges: 0 pyramids: 19782 tet wedges: 0 tetrahedra: 13680212 polyhedra: 0 Checking topology... Boundary definition OK. Cell to face addressing OK. Point usage OK. Upper triangular ordering OK. Face vertices OK. Number of regions: 1 (OK). Checking patch topology for multiply connected surfaces... Patch Faces Points Surface topology Inlet 954 526 ok (non-closed singly connected) Outlet 910 504 ok (non-closed singly connected) Lateral 66288 43790 ok (non-closed singly connected) Wall 1117395 560117 ok (non-closed singly connected) Checking faceZone topology for multiply connected surfaces... No faceZones found. Checking basic cellZone addressing... No cellZones found. Checking basic pointZone addressing... No pointZones found. Checking geometry... Overall domain bounding box (0 -11 0) (2.117 4 7.23) Mesh has 3 geometric (non-empty/wedge) directions (1 1 1) Mesh has 3 solution (non-empty) directions (1 1 1) Boundary openness (3.64032e-15 -1.89218e-16 2.24217e-16) OK. ***High aspect ratio cells found, Max aspect ratio: 1137.72, number of cells 1 <<Writing 1 cells with high aspect ratio to set highAspectRatioCells Minimum face area = 1.9128e-08. Maximum face area = 0.054844. Face area magnitudes OK. Min volume = 1.11514e-12. Max volume = 0.0047743. Total volume = 229.262. Cell volumes OK. Mesh non-orthogonality Max: 89.8501 average: 21.8076 *Number of severely non-orthogonal (> 70 degrees) faces: 28426. Non-orthogonality check OK. <<Writing 28426 non-orthogonal faces to set nonOrthoFaces Face pyramids OK. Max skewness = 3.78682 OK. Coupled point location match (average 0) OK. Failed 1 mesh checks. End Does anybody know what's going on? |
|
Tags |
no errors, no warnings, pisofoam |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Duct flow with two fans - SimpleFOAM stops after first iteration | Kryoleiche | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | September 14, 2021 05:40 |
Slow calculation time on CFD server | killian153 | Hardware | 4 | July 27, 2021 08:28 |
Floating point exception error | lpz_michele | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 53 | October 19, 2015 03:50 |
Hardware-Configuration for Fluent HPC-Pack (8x) | JohHaas | Hardware | 9 | March 3, 2015 14:25 |
Parallel runs slower with MTU=9000 than MTU=1500 | Javier Larrondo | FLUENT | 0 | October 28, 2007 23:30 |