CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

exploding interFOAM (variation of DTCHull)

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 3, 2023, 16:03
Default exploding interFOAM (variation of DTCHull)
  #1
New Member
 
Shai Aser
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 11
shaiashe is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I need help with my exploding simulation.
my mesh is quite large, but I made sure it's of high quality (non-ortho <70) and skewness < 3.5.
Code:
    Overall domain bounding box (-150 -200 -82) (769 0 82)
    Mesh has 3 geometric (non-empty/wedge) directions (1 1 1)
    Mesh has 3 solution (non-empty) directions (1 1 1)
    Boundary openness (5.3231506e-17 -1.9192017e-15 -7.1636234e-16) OK.
    Max cell openness = 8.413231e-16 OK.
    Max aspect ratio = 24.810447 OK.
    Minimum face area = 6.1169547e-06. Maximum face area = 18.649767.  Face area magnitudes OK.
    Min volume = 1.6255701e-06. Max volume = 87.633202.  Total volume = 30060593.  Cell volumes OK.
    Mesh non-orthogonality Max: 64.998208 average: 2.1675072
    Non-orthogonality check OK.
    Face pyramids OK.
    Max skewness = 3.2694797 OK.
    Coupled point location match (average 0) OK.
    Face tets OK.
   *Edges too small, min/max edge length = 4.824642e-09 4.4238302, number too small: 12
  <<Writing 12 points on short edges to set shortEdges
   *There are 441 faces with concave angles between consecutive edges. Max concave angle = 66.960231 degrees.
  <<Writing 441 faces with concave angles to set concaveFaces
    Face flatness (1 = flat, 0 = butterfly) : min = 0.68602191  average = 0.9999684
   *There are 6 faces with ratio between projected and actual area < 0.8
    Minimum ratio (minimum flatness, maximum warpage) = 0.68602191
  <<Writing 6 warped faces to set warpedFaces
    Cell determinant (wellposedness) : minimum: 0 average: 1.0646607
 ***Cells with small determinant (< 0.001) found, number of cells: 548
  <<Writing 548 under-determined cells to set underdeterminedCells
 ***Concave cells (using face planes) found, number of cells: 21473
  <<Writing 21473 concave cells to set concaveCells
    Face interpolation weight : minimum: 0.024440083 average: 0.49344369
 ***Faces with small interpolation weight (< 0.05) found, number of faces: 210
  <<Writing 210 faces with low interpolation weights to set lowWeightFaces
    Face volume ratio : minimum: 0.0132952 average: 0.97292238
    Face volume ratio check OK.
Even when I close off all of the boundaries as walls, the simulation explodes on the 2nd step with huge courant numbers (both of them).
with
Code:
Phase-1 volume fraction = 0.49988109  Min(alpha.water) = -1.2127875e-64  Max(alpha.water) = 1.0000392
does that mean the water is evaporating?

I set my fvSolution as :

Code:
FoamFile
{
    version     2.0;
    format      ascii;
    class       dictionary;
    object      fvSolution;
}
// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //

solvers
{
    "alpha.water.*"
    {
        nAlphaCorr      2;
        nAlphaSubCycles 1;
        cAlpha          1;
        icAlpha         0;

        MULESCorr       yes;
        nLimiterIter    10;
        alphaApplyPrevCorr  yes;

        solver          smoothSolver;
        smoother        symGaussSeidel;
        tolerance       1e-8;
        relTol          0;
        minIter         1;
    }

    "pcorr.*"
    {

        solver          GAMG;//PCG
        preconditioner  DIC;
        smoother        GaussSeidel;//Add by pol
        tolerance       1e-10; //1e-10
        relTol          0;
    }

    p_rgh
    {
        solver          GAMG;
        tolerance       1e-4;  //1e-7
        relTol          0.01;
        smoother        GaussSeidel;  //DIC
        nPreSweeps      0;
        nPostSweeps     2;
        cacheAgglomeration true; //false
        nCellsInCoarsestLevel 2090;//1000
        agglomerator    faceAreaPair;
        mergeLevels     1;

    }

    p_rghFinal
    {
        solver          GAMG;
        tolerance       1e-6;  //1e-7
        relTol          0.0;
        smoother        GaussSeidel;  //DIC
        nPreSweeps      0;
        nPostSweeps     2;
        cacheAgglomeration true; //false
        nCellsInCoarsestLevel 2090;//1000
        agglomerator    faceAreaPair;
        mergeLevels     1;
        /*$p_rgh;
        tolerance       1e-09;//1e-09
        relTol          0;*/
    }

    "(U|k|omega).*"
    {
        solver          smoothSolver;
        smoother        symGaussSeidel;
        nSweeps         1;
        tolerance       1e-7;
        relTol          0.1;
        minIter         1;
    };
    cellDisplacement
    {
        solver          GAMG;
        smoother        GaussSeidel;
        tolerance       1e-7;
        relTol          0.01;
    }	
}

PIMPLE
{
    momentumPredictor   no;

    nOuterCorrectors    5;
    nCorrectors         5;
    nNonOrthogonalCorrectors 2;
	correctPhi          yes;
    maxCo               1;
    maxAlphaCo          1;

    rDeltaTSmoothingCoeff 0.05;
    rDeltaTDampingCoeff 0.5;
    nAlphaSpreadIter    0;
    nAlphaSweepIter     0;
    maxDeltaT           1;
    residualControl
    {
        U
        {
                tolerance  1e-03;
                relTol     0;
        }

        p_rgh
        {
                tolerance  1e-03;
                relTol     0;
        }

    }	
}

relaxationFactors
{
    equations
    {
		p 0.3;
		U 0.7;
		k 0.7;
		omega 0.7;
    }
}

cache
{
    grad(U);
}
any advise?
Cheers,

Last edited by shaiashe; January 4, 2023 at 06:38.
shaiashe is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 4, 2023, 06:11
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Shai Aser
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 11
shaiashe is on a distinguished road
it looks like the flow is escaping through the top boundary; and that the explosion is related to the air fraction
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Capture.jpg (14.9 KB, 20 views)
shaiashe is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
open Channel, interFoam simulation keep numerically exploding Miguel Hernandez OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 7 April 20, 2022 09:20
Forces in interFoam laminar simulation (based on DTCHull tutorial) sharath.murthy OpenFOAM 4 December 11, 2020 03:11
interFoam DTCHull tutorial atmospheric BC kaaja OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 January 26, 2018 03:39
k-e & GAMG interFoam Schemitisation Stability Issue JFM OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 December 1, 2015 06:58
Variation of inlet hight in interFoam deniggo OpenFOAM 0 November 12, 2010 19:39


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:16.