|
[Sponsors] |
July 13, 2022, 12:52 |
Enabling LTS (for lagrangian solvers)
|
#1 |
New Member
Lennart
Join Date: May 2022
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 4 |
Hi,
I am wondering which measures are generally required to switch from fixed time steps to local time stepping in OpenFOAM. I was expecting this to be a common problem but I could not find any helpful information on it online. I am currently working with the lagrangian solver simpleReactingParcelFoam and I would like to use local time stepping to reduce the simulation run time as far as possible. Therefore, I have compared the tutorial cases verticalChannel and verticalChannelLTS in the tutorial directory lagrangian/reactingParcelFoam. I have noticed several differences in the controlDict, fvSchemes and fvSolutions files. One difference is the specification of a maximum Courant number (maxCo) in the fvSolutions. However, when I run the case verticalChannelLTS with different values for maxCo, it does not influence the run time. I was expecting that for small Courant numbers, the time steps would be decreased resulting in a longer run time. The same thing applies to the maximum time step maxDeltaT. Do you know why this is the case? Best regards |
|
Tags |
lagrangian, local time stepping, lts |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
So it's all just Taylor Expansion, Runge Kutta integration and Gauss-Seidel solvers? | aerosayan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | October 24, 2021 08:42 |
Should I focus on explicit or implicit solvers for transient simulations? | aerosayan | Main CFD Forum | 1 | April 11, 2021 08:31 |
Solid Mechanics Solvers added to OpenFOAM Extend | bigphil | OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources | 26 | October 12, 2017 05:01 |
FSI solvers - best solvers | steven123 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | July 8, 2014 11:26 |
Openfoam Ubuntu 12.04 Unmet dependencies | slls33 | OpenFOAM Installation | 10 | April 9, 2013 05:16 |