|
[Sponsors] |
Dynamic stall results turbulence models not matching |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
July 3, 2022, 08:01 |
Dynamic stall results turbulence models not matching
|
#1 |
New Member
Sandro Brad Martinez Sardon
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 5 |
Currently I am doing a research about dynamic stall in the following conditions : Re 1.35e5, k 0.15 and mach 0.1. Then I've used the SA and komegasst turbulence models. Therefore I just obtained the attached plots.
My question is that I am not able to justify the differences between the SA and komegasst, specifically in the upstroke and downstroke. It has to do with the boundary layer behaviour, or the way that the models are defined, the transient behaviour of the flow in this conditions?. I was looking for papers trying to justify it but still has no clue. Should you have any idea, please let me know. Thanks in advance. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Turbulence postprocessing | Mohsin | FLUENT | 2 | October 3, 2016 15:18 |
Advice about turbulence models? | mqsim | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | April 27, 2016 08:50 |
Turbulence models | Reza Imani | Main CFD Forum | 7 | April 8, 2016 10:15 |
Bubble Column Simulation: Different Turbulence Models different results | zobekenobe | CFX | 5 | January 28, 2013 10:02 |
Why Turbulence models are not universal. | Senthil | Main CFD Forum | 4 | July 5, 2000 05:34 |