CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

openfoam motorbike benchmark explosion

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 7, 2022, 07:37
Default openfoam motorbike benchmark explosion
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
quantumwire is on a distinguished road
Dear forum,

I'm by no means a knowledgeable openfoam user since I have no clue about CFD in general.

However,

my intention is to run a scalable openfoam benchmark for which I found this one:

https://github.com/do-jason/OpenFOAM...arks/motorbike

The benchmark looks good to me (I guess) since I could tune the size of the problem (MCells) and the number of cpus.

The problem with it is that the simulation explodes after the first few steps.

I've compiled two openfoam version (V2112 and V2106) and tested the 42 MCells setup using 16 cores and 1 TB of RAM.

With both openfoam versions I get this log in which the 'sum local' number in the 'time step continuity errors' line diverges extremely quickly leading to a simulation failure:

Code:
...
Time = 1

smoothSolver:  Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 0.287454, Final residual = 0.0159974, No Iterations 22
smoothSolver:  Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0.670437, Final residual = 0.0578161, No Iterations 19
smoothSolver:  Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 0.713336, Final residual = 0.0384459, No Iterations 19
GAMG:  Solving for p, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 0.131524, No Iterations 1000
time step continuity errors : sum local = 1.81912e+08, global = 861174, cumulative = 861174
smoothSolver:  Solving for omega, Initial residual = 0.113341, Final residual = 0.00964374, No Iterations 4
smoothSolver:  Solving for k, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 0.0804192, No Iterations 4
ExecutionTime = 174.48 s  ClockTime = 174 s

forceCoeffs forceCoeffs1 execute:
    Coefficients
        Cd       : 2.2912e+14   (pressure: 2.2912e+14   viscous: 3.724e+07)
        Cs       : 1.5138e+13   (pressure: 1.51381e+13  viscous: -6.80952e+07)
        Cl       : 7.90224e+12  (pressure: 7.90232e+12  viscous: -8.50578e+07)
        CmRoll       : -3.08433e+13     (pressure: -3.08433e+13 viscous: 8.91239e+06)
        CmPitch       : 9.23788e+13     (pressure: 9.23788e+13  viscous: 2.55493e+06)
        CmYaw       : -1.7646e+13       (pressure: -1.7646e+13  viscous: -2.22275e+07)
        Cd(f)    : 8.37169e+13
        Cd(r)    : 1.45404e+14
        Cs(f)    : -1.0077e+13
        Cs(r)    : 2.52151e+13
        Cl(f)    : 9.63299e+13
        Cl(r)    : -8.84277e+13
Time = 2

smoothSolver:  Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 0.665592, Final residual = 0.0643762, No Iterations 47
smoothSolver:  Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0.610635, Final residual = 0.0404073, No Iterations 58
smoothSolver:  Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 0.600655, Final residual = 0.0574642, No Iterations 45
GAMG:  Solving for p, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 0.0199624, No Iterations 1000
time step continuity errors : sum local = 2.39263e+19, global = -7.23625e+16, cumulative = -7.23625e+16
smoothSolver:  Solving for omega, Initial residual = 0.107859, Final residual = 0.00710626, No Iterations 4
smoothSolver:  Solving for k, Initial residual = 0.381193, Final residual = 0.0353298, No Iterations 3
ExecutionTime = 341 s  ClockTime = 341 s

forceCoeffs forceCoeffs1 execute:
    Coefficients
        Cd       : 2.41032e+33  (pressure: 2.41032e+33  viscous: -7.07675e+19)
        Cs       : 5.40342e+33  (pressure: 5.40342e+33  viscous: 2.95738e+20)
        Cl       : 7.57467e+32  (pressure: 7.57467e+32  viscous: -3.32622e+19)
        CmRoll       : -2.66388e+33     (pressure: -2.66388e+33 viscous: -1.76725e+20)
        CmPitch       : 1.04103e+33     (pressure: 1.04103e+33  viscous: -3.59468e+19)
        CmYaw       : 8.57365e+31       (pressure: 8.57365e+31  viscous: 7.09699e+19)
        Cd(f)    : -1.45872e+33
        Cd(r)    : 3.86904e+33
        Cs(f)    : 2.78745e+33
        Cs(r)    : 2.61598e+33
        Cl(f)    : 1.41977e+33
        Cl(r)    : -6.62301e+32
Time = 3

[19] #0  Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&) at ??:?
[19] #1  Foam::sigFpe::sigHandler(int) at ??:?
[19] #2  ? in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
[19] #3  Foam::GaussSeidelSmoother::smooth(Foam::word const&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::lduMatrix const&, Foam::Field<double> const&, Foam::FieldField<Foam::Field, double> const&, Foam::UPtrList<Foam::lduInterfaceField const> const&, unsigned char, int) at ??:?
...

Any advise about stabilizing this simulation is greatly appreciated.
quantumwire is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OpenFOAM Training Jan-Apr 2017, Virtual, London, Houston, Berlin cfd.direct OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources 0 September 21, 2016 12:50
[OpenFOAM.org] A Mac OS X of23x Development Environment Using Docker rt08 OpenFOAM Installation 1 February 28, 2016 20:00
Cross-compiling OpenFOAM 1.7.0 on Linux for Windows 32 and 64bits with Mingw-w64 wyldckat OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources 3 September 8, 2010 07:25
OpenFOAM Debian packaging current status problems and TODOs oseen OpenFOAM Installation 9 August 26, 2007 14:50
OpenFOAM Training and Workshop Zagreb 2628Jan2006 hjasak OpenFOAM 1 February 2, 2006 22:07


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:24.