|
[Sponsors] |
Convergence Problems in rhoSimpleFoam with Complex Mesh |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 29, 2022, 13:30 |
Convergence Problems in rhoSimpleFoam with Complex Mesh
|
#1 |
New Member
Anuar Giménez
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: Spain
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 4 |
Hi all,
I am trying to simulate a polymer flow through a single screw extruder, such as the one shown below: I modified some libraries to correctly introduce the non-Newtonian fluid behavior and ran some simulations with simple geometries to check that everything worked fine. They converge very well and have physical meaning. Then, I changed to a more complex geometry, as the one shown in the attachment. It is a static single screw extruder, i am not considering the rotation of the screw. ExtruderGeometry.png The problem is that I cannot achieve convergence. The enthalpy is going well, however the velocities and pressure remain constant between e-3 and e-4. An image of residuals is attached. Residuals.jpg It is a stationary simulation, using rhoSimpleFoam. My initial conditions are: Code:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\ | ========= | | | \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox | | \\ / O peration | Version: v2112 | | \\ / A nd | Website: www.openfoam.com | | \\/ M anipulation | | \*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class volScalarField; object p; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // dimensions [1 -1 -2 0 0 0 0]; internalField uniform 1e5; boundaryField { wall1 { type fixedFluxPressure; value uniform 0; } wall2 { type fixedFluxPressure; value uniform 0; } screw { type fixedFluxPressure; value uniform 0; } outlet { type fixedValue; value uniform 1e5; } inlet { type zeroGradient; } } // ************************************************************************* // Code:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\ | ========= | | | \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox | | \\ / O peration | Version: v2112 | | \\ / A nd | Website: www.openfoam.com | | \\/ M anipulation | | \*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class volScalarField; object T; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // dimensions [0 0 0 1 0 0 0]; internalField uniform 405.65; //initial condition boundaryField { wall1 { type convectiveRadiativeHeatFlux; mode convectiveRadiative; Ta constant 513.15; h uniform 215; //Heat transfer coefficient [W/(m²*K)] emissivityNozzle 0.95; //Emissivity nozzle (or brass) [-] emissivityFilament 0.95; //Emissivity filament [-] dNozzle 4.0; //inner diameter nozzle [mm} dFilament 1.75; //filament diameter [mm] kappaMethod fluidThermo; value $internalField; //initial Temperature value } wall2 { type fixedValue; value uniform 513.15; // solo calor en la zona 2 } screw { type zeroGradient; } outlet { type zeroGradient; } inlet { type fixedValue; value uniform 298.15; // temperature ambient 25ºC } } // ************************************************************************* // Code:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\ | ========= | | | \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox | | \\ / O peration | Version: v2112 | | \\ / A nd | Website: www.openfoam.com | | \\/ M anipulation | | \*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class volVectorField; object U; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // dimensions [0 1 -1 0 0 0 0]; internalField uniform (0 0 0); boundaryField { wall1 { type slip; } wall2 { type noSlip; } screw { type slip; } outlet { type zeroGradient; } inlet { type flowRateInletVelocity; massFlowRate constant 1e-05; // kg/s rho rho; rhoInlet 1000; // Guess for rho } } // ************************************************************************* // Code:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\ | ========= | | | \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox | | \\ / O peration | Version: v2112 | | \\ / A nd | Website: www.openfoam.com | | \\/ M anipulation | | \*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class dictionary; object controlDict; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // application polymSimpleFoam; startFrom latestTime; startTime 0; stopAt endTime; endTime 0.003; deltaT 0.00000005; //Time step should be chosen so small that a Courant number is less than 1 writeControl timeStep; writeInterval 600; //Number of output folders or steps in ParaView (deltaT*writeInterval = step width of the folders) purgeWrite 0; writeFormat binary; writePrecision 10; writeCompression off; timeFormat general; timePrecision 6; graphFormat raw; runTimeModifiable true; //_______below additional outputs and options functions //https://www.openfoam.com/documentation/guides/latest/doc/guide-function-objects.html { // Writes the residuals for each iteration step to a file in the postProcessing folder, graphing while solving via the "AllMonitor" script residual1 { type residuals; libs ("libutilityFunctionObjects.so"); writeControl timeStep; writeInterval 1; fields (p U h); } // The fieldMinMax function object computes the values and locations of field minima and maxima. These are good indicators of calculation performance, e.g. to confirm that predicted results are within expected bounds, or how well a case is converging. minMax { type volFieldValue; libs ("libfieldFunctionObjects.so"); fields (U p); executeControl writeTime; writeControl writeTime; writeFields false; log false; regionType all; operation max; } writeThermophysicalProperties { type writeObjects; libs ("libutilityFunctionObjects.so"); objects (thermo:alpha thermo:mu); //executeControl timeStep; writeControl writeTime; //writeInterval 60; } } // ************************************************************************* // Code:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\ | ========= | | | \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox | | \\ / O peration | Version: v2112 | | \\ / A nd | Website: www.openfoam.com | | \\/ M anipulation | | \*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class dictionary; object fvSchemes; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // ddtSchemes { default steadyState; } gradSchemes { default Gauss linear upwind; limited cellLimited Gauss linear 0.1; grad(U) $limited; } divSchemes { default none; div(phi,U) bounded Gauss linearUpwind grad(U); energy bounded Gauss linearUpwind limited; div(phi,e) bounded Gauss linearUpwind limited; div(phi,Ekp) bounded Gauss linearUpwind limited; div(phi,h) bounded Gauss linearUpwind limited; div(phi,K) bounded Gauss linearUpwind limited; div(((rho*nuEff)*dev2(T(grad(U))))) Gauss linear; } laplacianSchemes { default Gauss linear corrected; } interpolationSchemes { default linear; } snGradSchemes { default corrected; } // ************************************************************************* // Code:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\ | ========= | | | \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox | | \\ / O peration | Version: v2112 | | \\ / A nd | Website: www.openfoam.com | | \\/ M anipulation | | \*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class dictionary; object fvSolution; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // solvers { p { solver GAMG; preconditioner GAMG; tolerance 1e-07; relTol 0.1; smoother DICGaussSeidel; cacheAgglomeration true; nCellsInCoarsestLevel 145; agglomerator faceAreaPair; mergeLevels 1; directSolveCoarsest false; } U { solver smoothSolver; smoother GaussSeidel; nSweeps 1; tolerance 1e-08; relTol 0.01; } "(e|h)" { solver smoothSolver; smoother GaussSeidel; nSweeps 2; tolerance 1e-09; relTol 0.01; } } SIMPLE { nNonOrthogonalCorrectors 2; pMinFactor 0.99; pMaxFactor 200; transonic no; consistent yes; rhoMax rhoMax [ 1 -3 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1.2; rhoMin rhoMin [ 1 -3 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.9; residualControl { p 1e-6; U 1e-5; h 1e-7; } } relaxationFactors { U 0.6; p 0.5; rho 0.01; h 0.5; } // ************************************************************************* // It would be a great help if you could give me some advice to improve convergence. Thanks, Anuar |
|
May 30, 2022, 07:05 |
|
#2 |
Member
Lukas
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 5 |
Hello Anuar,
from shortly locking on your case : Your control dict "looks" like a transient simualtion but u defined steadystate in fvSchemes.... this is pure optics From your resiudal plot your case is converging very well.. they not need to be very low for good convergence. More important are your physical parameters like temperature distribution and flowfield speed. Never only watch residuals they just show you the direction if something is odd. But... IF you use consistent setting with simple (SIMPLEC) your under relaxation should be near 1 for pressure and rho and 0.95 for other convectives (https://www.openfoam.com/documentati...orithm-control) Chapter 6.3.2 |
|
May 30, 2022, 17:21 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
Anuar Giménez
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: Spain
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 4 |
Quote:
thank you so much for your quick response. I read somewhere on the internet, that to improve convergence it is convenient to decrease the number of Courant, so I set a very small timestep. However, as you say, since it is a stationary simulation, without time derivative, it is useless. I have corrected this by setting dt = 1. I have no experience with the SIMPLEC algorithm, your answer was very helpful. I have changed the under relaxation coefficients to: Code:
relaxationFactors { U 0.9; p 1; rho 1; h 0.9; } Residualsv2.jpg It behaves a little unstable at the beginning and then converges with a little high residual. I have to mention that small changes in the relaxationFactors values highly affect the residuals plot. I don't know if I could consider this a good convergence. Maybe a change in fvSchemes would help to improve this. Regarding the physical meaning of the simulation with these parameters, the temperature seems ok. However, the velocity (and therefore pressure) do not make me feel confident (which does not mean that they are wrong). The boundary condition for inlet velocity is as follows: Code:
inlet { type flowRateInletVelocity; massFlowRate 3e-05;// kg/s extrapolateProfile yes; rho rho; rhoInlet 1040; value uniform (0 0 0); } Temperature: Post_T.png Pressure: Post_p.png Velocity: Post_U.png I would greatly appreciate your opinion. Thanks, Anuar |
||
June 1, 2022, 02:57 |
|
#4 |
Member
Lukas
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 5 |
Good Morning,
from my Point of View the resiudals are just fine, they show a nice convergence . the Pictures for Temperature seems very plausible also for velocity. The pressure goes high due to expansion(heating)(of your polymer), I assume ? (Never worked with that specific solver nor the underlying physics) As you mentioned your fvSchemes u can always take a look at: https://cfd.direct/openfoam/user-guide/v9-fvschemes/ Here u find good information on "practical" values |
|
Tags |
convergence, openfoam, residuals, rhosimplefoam, simplefoam |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Convergence problems unsteady conjugate heat flow problem when refining mesh | Sven_netherlands | COMSOL | 0 | December 2, 2020 05:32 |
[blockMesh] mesh causing problems with convergence | Tetragramm | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | September 22, 2012 17:00 |
increasing mesh quality is leading to poor convergence | tippo | CFX | 2 | May 5, 2009 11:55 |
How to control Minximum mesh space? | hung | FLUENT | 7 | April 18, 2005 10:38 |
unstructured vs. structured grids | Frank Muldoon | Main CFD Forum | 1 | January 5, 1999 11:09 |