difference between const and sutherland transport model in thermophysicalproperties

Tegdlemat · July 17, 2021, 08:33

Hi all foamers,

Currently I am working on a hypersonic flow case with a double wedge. I have validated the laminar case with a inviscid condition, now moving on to laminar viscous. However, when I modified the mu from 0 to 1.2777e-5 with the transport model const, the boundary layer barely developed and no separation bubble between two wedges. I have double checked the bc of the surface of the wedges, which I defined to fixed value (0 0 0) since noSlip does not seem to work when I was trying to view it in Paraview. I would like to know whether switching to sutherland will solve this problem?

Thanks!

dlahaye · July 20, 2021, 05:22

Please elaborate on "no slip not working when viewing in paraview". No slip has been successfully applied to many of us here.

July 17, 2021, 08:33	difference between const and sutherland transport model in thermophysicalproperties	#1
Tegdlemat New Member Matthew Join Date: May 2021 Posts: 10 Rep Power: 5	Hi all foamers, Currently I am working on a hypersonic flow case with a double wedge. I have validated the laminar case with a inviscid condition, now moving on to laminar viscous. However, when I modified the mu from 0 to 1.2777e-5 with the transport model const, the boundary layer barely developed and no separation bubble between two wedges. I have double checked the bc of the surface of the wedges, which I defined to fixed value (0 0 0) since noSlip does not seem to work when I was trying to view it in Paraview. I would like to know whether switching to sutherland will solve this problem? Thanks!

July 20, 2021, 05:22		#2
dlahaye Senior Member Domenico Lahaye Join Date: Dec 2013 Posts: 783 Blog Entries: 1 Rep Power: 17	Please elaborate on "no slip not working when viewing in paraview". No slip has been successfully applied to many of us here.