CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Unrealistic jet phenomenon in twoPhaseEulerFoam

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 16, 2021, 21:15
Default Unrealistic jet phenomenon in twoPhaseEulerFoam
  #1
Member
 
Huan Zhang
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 55
Rep Power: 6
Jasper Z is on a distinguished road
Dear all,

I am recently struggling with the air jet into stagnant water, as you can see in the attachment, the air phase trajectory divided from the jet centerline, which is not realistic. I am using twoPhaseEulerFoam, the lift force coefficient is set to be 0.5 (I saw many literature using this value).

Is there anybody facing the same problem or can you give me a suggestion? Very appreciate.
Attached Images
File Type: png 2021-02-16 181754.png (33.3 KB, 21 views)
Jasper Z is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 16, 2021, 21:41
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Katsantonis Michalis
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 9
mixkats is on a distinguished road
Not sure if it will help, but check this paper:
HTML Code:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210983815001364
In section 4 mentions the set up, which once solved a similar issue of mine (air, water, twoPhaseEulerFoam)
mixkats is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 16, 2021, 22:11
Default
  #3
Member
 
Huan Zhang
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 55
Rep Power: 6
Jasper Z is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by mixkats View Post
Not sure if it will help, but check this paper:
HTML Code:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210983815001364
In section 4 mentions the set up, which once solved a similar issue of mine (air, water, twoPhaseEulerFoam)
Dear Katsantonis,

Thanks for the paper, I checked the paper but the setup is more or less the same, I used the fvScheme and fvSolution from the bubble column tutorial. I think the main reason is the lift force. In this paper, Tomiyama lift coefficient is used, but when I use the same coefficient, the result is similar.

I have also tried Cl=0.1, the result seems better, but the lateral distribution is thinner than realistic (left figure).

Furthermore, I tried the classic Deen Column using mixture rans model, the distribution is also unrealistic, as you can see in the right figure at 10 s. The lift coefficient is 0.25 in this case.

Do you have any suggestion about this phenomenon?
Attached Images
File Type: png 2021-02-16 191257.png (51.0 KB, 20 views)
File Type: png 2021-02-16 191321.png (86.7 KB, 19 views)
Jasper Z is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 1, 2022, 16:42
Default
  #4
Member
 
Huan Zhang
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 55
Rep Power: 6
Jasper Z is on a distinguished road
This problem has not been solved yet, looking forward to any suggestions1
Jasper Z is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Hand" calculation jet fan in the garage mageno Main CFD Forum 3 August 7, 2021 20:09
twoPhaseEulerFoam confined plunging jet simulation failed ves OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 June 17, 2020 06:08
2D Plane Jet Fluent Solution doug Main CFD Forum 11 February 4, 2019 10:34
Unrealistic behavior in twoPhaseEulerFoam voingiappone OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 7 December 5, 2014 17:33
Jet in Supersonic Crossflow, controlling mass flow rate ChrisA OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 November 13, 2012 19:20


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:14.