|
[Sponsors] |
December 31, 2020, 07:05 |
simpleFoam+MRF vs pipleFoam+dynamicMesh
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 74
Rep Power: 11 |
Dear all,
I have a question regarding the difference between the two approaches, MRF and dynamic mesh. I’m referring to the propeller tutorial: Code:
/foam/tutorials/incompressible/pimpleFoam/RAS/propeller However I modified the topoSet dictionary to split the patch of rotating zone into inlet outlet and cylinder. Then I tried to evaluate the Thrust of the propeller using the two approaches: 1) pimpleFoam +dynamicMeshDict: this is an unsteady analysis that imposes the rotation of the innerCylinderSmall cellZone using the dynamicMeshDict file. The solver is pimpleFoam and I used the same setting of the tutorial case. After 0.3s of physical time the Thrust (y direction) is 369.55N Residuals are 6E-3 for pressure and 1E-3 for velocities. 2) simpleFoam + MRFProperties: a steady analyses. I added the MRFProperties dictionary in place of the dynamicMeshDict. Same rotational velocity, same rotation axis. I modified the fvSolution and fvSchemes accordingly with the simpleFoam solver. After 4000 iterations the Thrust (y direction) is 940.27N. Residuals are 6E-4 for pressure and 6E-5 for velocities. Both the analysis seems to converge (to a stable integral value of Thrust); however the results are very different. Where am I wrong? Also the streamlines are different: in pimpleFoam+dynamicMesh the U field represents the absolute velocity, however what is the U field of the MRF zone in the simpleFoam case? These streamlines don’t seem neither the absolute or relative velocities.. Attached is the postprocessing in Paraview, you can notice how both the pressure field and the streamlines are different. Thanks, WhiteW |
|
December 31, 2020, 14:22 |
|
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 74
Rep Power: 11 |
The error seems related to cyclicAMI patches when using MRF.
I run an analysis with simpleFoam without MRF untill it converges (first pictures) then I added the MRFProperties file to constant folder with a low rotational velocity. And the results after 10 iterates in on the second picture. The pressure field completely changes in 10 iterates, even if the rotational velocity of MRF is 0.001 rad/s... How is it possible? Here is my MRFProperties: Code:
MRF1 { cellZone innerCylinderSmall; active yes; // Fixed patches (by default they 'move' with the MRF zone) nonRotatingPatches (); origin (0 0 0); axis (0 1 0); omega 0.001; // [rad/s] } And this is the boundary file: Code:
13 ( outerCylinder { type wall; inGroups 1(wall); nFaces 640; startFace 1578336; } propellerTip { type wall; inGroups 1(wall); nFaces 21811; startFace 1578976; } propellerStem1 { type wall; inGroups 1(wall); nFaces 192; startFace 1600787; } propellerStem2 { type wall; inGroups 1(wall); nFaces 576; startFace 1600979; } propellerStem3 { type wall; inGroups 1(wall); nFaces 1536; startFace 1601555; } inlet { type patch; nFaces 652; startFace 1603091; } outlet { type patch; nFaces 112; startFace 1603743; } AMI1 { type cyclicAMI; inGroups 1(cyclicAMI); nFaces 9504; startFace 1603855; matchTolerance 0.0001; transform noOrdering; neighbourPatch AMI2; method faceAreaWeightAMI; } AMI2 { type cyclicAMI; inGroups 1(cyclicAMI); nFaces 9680; startFace 1613359; matchTolerance 0.0001; transform noOrdering; neighbourPatch AMI1; method faceAreaWeightAMI; } AMI1in { type cyclicAMI; inGroups 1(cyclicAMI); nFaces 4388; startFace 1623039; matchTolerance 0.0001; transform noOrdering; neighbourPatch AMI2in; method faceAreaWeightAMI; } AMI2in { type cyclicAMI; inGroups 1(cyclicAMI); nFaces 4412; startFace 1627427; matchTolerance 0.0001; transform noOrdering; neighbourPatch AMI1in; method faceAreaWeightAMI; } AMI1out { type cyclicAMI; inGroups 1(cyclicAMI); nFaces 4604; startFace 1631839; matchTolerance 0.0001; transform noOrdering; neighbourPatch AMI2out; method faceAreaWeightAMI; } AMI2out { type cyclicAMI; inGroups 1(cyclicAMI); nFaces 4628; startFace 1636443; matchTolerance 0.0001; transform noOrdering; neighbourPatch AMI1out; method faceAreaWeightAMI; } ) WhiteW |
|
May 3, 2021, 10:32 |
|
#3 |
Member
Gabriel Felix
Join Date: May 2021
Location: Brazil
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 6 |
I'm trying to do the same. I I have ran the propeller case and now I'm trying to run it with simpleFoam. Have you managed to run it correctly?
|
|
May 6, 2021, 04:51 |
|
#4 | |
Member
Paul Palladium
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 94
Rep Power: 10 |
Hello,
If I am right in your simpleFoam + MRF setup you have to tell to OpenFOAM that your cyclic patch are non rotating. so : Quote:
Best regards |
||
May 11, 2021, 11:14 |
|
#5 | |
Member
Gabriel Felix
Join Date: May 2021
Location: Brazil
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 6 |
In which file do I have to set this command?
Quote:
Last edited by gabrielfelix; May 11, 2021 at 15:36. Reason: Found the answer |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
simpleFoam: Influence of MRF region dimensions on simulation results | Krao | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 4 | March 29, 2022 22:33 |
simpleFoam + MRF properties: FATAL ERROR: not implemented | student666 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | April 11, 2021 04:11 |
MRF case - simpleFoam quits after building mesh for time = 0 | .bastian | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 8 | February 7, 2020 17:42 |
SRFSimpleFoam vs SimpleFoam (MRF) | oscar_urri | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 9 | November 13, 2018 18:18 |
Simulation of Radial Fan with simpleFoam MRF | nash | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | November 5, 2015 11:12 |