CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

SimpleFoam: Weird low velocity region/bar at leading edg

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 29, 2020, 09:10
Default SimpleFoam: Weird low velocity region/bar at leading edg
  #1
New Member
 
Kyfrankie
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 6
kyfrankie is on a distinguished road
The case is ran with SimpleFOAM using kOmegaSST turbulence model at RE=50000, free stream velocity of 4.8m/s. The solution reached a steady "converged" stage but the residual of p fail to drops below 1e-3, others residuals are okay though. However, when viewing the U in paraView, there's two weird low velocity region at the leading edge. I am puzzled about what is going on. It would be great I can find some tips and advices here. Thanks in advance.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg mesh.jpg (181.8 KB, 18 views)
File Type: png p.png (144.5 KB, 16 views)
File Type: png u.png (144.9 KB, 17 views)
kyfrankie is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 29, 2020, 16:44
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Troy Snyder
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 220
Rep Power: 19
tas38 is on a distinguished road
The "lines" appear to coincide to the transitions in surface mesh density. I suspect the low velocities are of numerical origin.
tas38 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 30, 2020, 00:20
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Kyfrankie
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 6
kyfrankie is on a distinguished road
Thanks a lot for your reply. I have made the refinement level to the same (6,6) and the "line" seems to be less aggressive but still appear. In addition, if the force coefficient converged to a stable value but the residuals fail to drop below 1e-4. Is it still considered converged? Any advice to improve convergence? Thanks in advance!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg mesh.jpg (93.4 KB, 10 views)
File Type: png u.png (121.8 KB, 12 views)
File Type: png Residuals.png (53.0 KB, 11 views)
File Type: png ForceCoeffs.png (30.3 KB, 8 views)
kyfrankie is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 30, 2020, 07:14
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Troy Snyder
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 220
Rep Power: 19
tas38 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyfrankie View Post
Thanks a lot for your reply. I have made the refinement level to the same (6,6) and the "line" seems to be less aggressive but still appear. In addition, if the force coefficient converged to a stable value but the residuals fail to drop below 1e-4. Is it still considered converged? Any advice to improve convergence? Thanks in advance!
Yes, I would consider the case converged considering the residuals and lift/drag coefficients you presented. If you desire to reduce the continuity residuals further, it may be possible to do so by adjusting the solver settings (e.g. discretization schemes) and/or mesh density/quality. You can think of the solver as "having converged to within the constraints imposed by the current mesh and discretization schemes". Note that by "mesh" I also include the proximity boundary surfaces to the wing/airfoil surface.
tas38 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 1, 2020, 13:01
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Michael Alletto
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Bremen
Posts: 616
Rep Power: 16
mAlletto will become famous soon enough
There may be some reciculation regions on the right edge of the airfoil which explains the high pressure residuals.

Regarding the low velocity close to the leading edge did you check if you can expect a laminar recirculation bubble.

Michael
mAlletto is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 4, 2020, 04:55
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Kyfrankie
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 6
kyfrankie is on a distinguished road
I believe the "line" may be caused by an issue in the STL file. Also, I found that by setting the refinement of the Wing to be uniform (6 6) instead of (6 7) helps the convergence after adding a absolute layer near the wing wall.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg stk.jpg (59.1 KB, 8 views)
kyfrankie is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 4, 2020, 07:52
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Michael Alletto
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Bremen
Posts: 616
Rep Power: 16
mAlletto will become famous soon enough
The stl seams to be not smooth. So probably you have to fix this first. Do you have wall layers? What kind of boundary conditions are you using
mAlletto is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Weird velocity results for low mach number combustion Rafael Meier OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 June 8, 2018 12:36
Velocity in Porous medium : HELP! HELP! HELP! Kali Sanjay Phoenics 0 November 6, 2006 07:10
Variables Definition in CFX Solver 5.6 R P CFX 2 October 26, 2004 03:13
Multicomponent fluid Andrea CFX 2 October 11, 2004 06:12
Terrible Mistake In Fluid Dynamics History Abhi Main CFD Forum 12 July 8, 2002 10:11


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:07.