|
[Sponsors] |
September 22, 2020, 11:42 |
Wall Conditions : fixedValue or noSlip
|
#1 |
Member
Ilan
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 52
Rep Power: 8 |
Hello Foamers,
I need you. For 2 years now I am modeling a tidal turbine using an AMI and a wall condition on my blades : {type movingWallVelocity; value uniform (0 0 0);} But I noticed yesterday with this wall condition, I have no adherence on my blade : the velocity is not null on my rotor. So I switched to a noSlip condition. { type noSlip; } It gives me the velocity repartition in the 2 "noSlip" screen that are joined. Even if the solid normal velocity seems to be 0, the noSlip condition iss not respected in the 0 directions. At least, I used a fixed value condition : { type fixedValue; value uniform (0 0 0); } Here I have at least my 0 velocity on my blade patches. I am trying to get a reasonable Cp for my turbine using pimpleFoam. So I think that i have to resolve the boundary layer. I am know wondering if I Have to switch all my cases to fixed value 0 because it's the only case where I actually get a boundary layer. Could you please explain me the difference between this conditions : fixedValue is not defined in the documentation as a wall condition but for now on, it is the closest condition of it. Thanks, Have a great day ! Magistrane NoSlip2.png No Slip2 No_Slip1.png No slip1 Moving_Wall.png Movingwallvelocity FixedValue.png fixed value(0 0 0) |
|
September 28, 2020, 06:12 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Carlo_P
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Italy
Posts: 176
Rep Power: 8 |
The most correct should be movingWallVelocity.
It is correct that the velocity is not zero, becasue the velocity at the wall is not zero! Is the same velocity as the wall that is rotating. In thi case, the velocity should be around omega*r, where omega is the radiant/sec. If you see the pics, the velocity is growing with the radius, so it is ok. |
|
September 28, 2020, 06:22 |
|
#3 |
Member
Ilan
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 52
Rep Power: 8 |
I don't get it.
Of course the velocity of the rotor isn't zero : it is rotating... But, shouldn't every solid have a 0 FLOW velocity on it's surface ? If it's not, you will never see the boundary layer ! Why should be the flow velocity equal to omega*r with an adherence condition ? :/ |
|
September 28, 2020, 06:32 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Carlo_P
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Italy
Posts: 176
Rep Power: 8 |
Ahderence condition:
In fluid dynamics, the no-slip condition for viscous fluids assumes that at a solid boundary, the fluid will have zero velocity relative to the boundary. The fluid velocity at all fluid–solid boundaries is equal to that of the solid boundary.[1] (wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-slip_condition) The velocity at the wall should be the same as the wall one. So, if the wall is moving, the velocity of the air should be the same as the moving wall. If a car is moving at 100 km/h, the velocity of the air should be 100 km/h next to the wall. It is a zero velocity relative to the car velocity. You will have always a bounday layer, because the velocity at the wall is not exactly the same as the velocity at the wall+0.00001 mm. You will always have a gradient in the direction perpendicolar to the wall. |
|
September 28, 2020, 07:55 |
|
#5 |
Member
Ilan
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 52
Rep Power: 8 |
Of course !...
I forgot the referential ! Thanks Carlo for your precious explanations ! |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wind turbine simulation | Saturn | CFX | 60 | July 17, 2024 06:45 |
decomposePar problem: Cell 0contains face labels out of range | vaina74 | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 37 | July 20, 2020 06:38 |
Table bounds warnings at: END OF TIME STEP | CFXer | CFX | 4 | July 17, 2020 00:44 |
Why Menter's SST model low-Re issue has not been seriously investigated? | vkrastev | OpenFOAM | 58 | January 8, 2018 16:20 |
Difficulty In Setting Boundary Conditions | Moinul Haque | CFX | 4 | November 25, 2014 18:30 |