CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Constant Prandtl Number with Sutherland Transport

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 23, 2020, 09:42
Default Constant Prandtl Number with Sutherland Transport
  #1
Member
 
Josh Kelly
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 8
joshkellyjak is on a distinguished road
Hi,

Is it possible to set a constant Prandtl number alongside the Sutherland transport model? From my results so far it appears Pr=1 (approx) but I want Pr = 0.71 throughout the flow, how do I do this? I am using the rhoCentralFoam and my test case is supersonic flow over a flat plate.

Thanks in advance
joshkellyjak is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 23, 2020, 13:26
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Gerhard Holzinger
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Austria
Posts: 342
Rep Power: 28
GerhardHolzinger will become famous soon enoughGerhardHolzinger will become famous soon enough
Most probably not.

When you select Sutherland for the transport model, you specify how OpenFOAM calculates the dynamic viscosity and the thermal conductivity.
This leaves you with no remaining independent quantities. Hence, the Prandtl number is already fixed.

The screenshots attached to this post, were taken from my "manual", which can be found here
Attached Images
File Type: png sutherlandViscosity.png (23.6 KB, 122 views)
File Type: png sutherlandThermalConductivity.png (29.5 KB, 117 views)
GerhardHolzinger is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 20, 2020, 13:51
Default
  #3
Member
 
Himanshu
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 9
Himanshu_Shrivastava is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by GerhardHolzinger View Post
Most probably not.

When you select Sutherland for the transport model, you specify how OpenFOAM calculates the dynamic viscosity and the thermal conductivity.
This leaves you with no remaining independent quantities. Hence, the Prandtl number is already fixed.

The screenshots attached to this post, were taken from my "manual", which can be found here
Hello Gerhard,

you mean to say that we don't need to give prandtl number if we give viscosity as Sutherland?
Himanshu_Shrivastava is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 20, 2020, 14:25
Default
  #4
Member
 
Himanshu
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 9
Himanshu_Shrivastava is on a distinguished road
Ya...I got the answer. We don't have to mentioned it.

Thanks
Himanshu_Shrivastava is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
openfoam, prandtl number, rhocentralfoam, sutherland, transport model


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ImmersedBoundary] Immersed Boundary Method in OpenFOAM-3.1-ext miladrakhsha OpenFOAM Community Contributions 106 July 3, 2023 11:26
[mesh manipulation] mergeMeshes for more than two fluid domains Vishsel OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 17 May 20, 2019 08:05
Inconsistencies in reading .dat file during run time in new injection model Scram_1 OpenFOAM 0 March 23, 2018 23:29
[OpenFOAM.org] OF2.3.1 + OS13.2 - Trying to use the dummy Pstream library aylalisa OpenFOAM Installation 23 June 15, 2015 15:49
[blockMesh] BlockMeshmergePatchPairs hjasak OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 11 August 15, 2008 08:36


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:10.