|
[Sponsors] |
Crazy results on a simple case, no turbulence decay |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 16, 2020, 14:13 |
Crazy results on a simple case, no turbulence decay
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 6 |
Dear all,
I'm getting crazy because of unrealistic results I got from an incompressible simulation with simpleFoam. The domain is the one reported in the attached picture, a wall bounded flow over a flat plate (on the domain upper endwall I applied slip condition). I had to check the turbulence decay along the domain to control that the lenght-scale chosen is correct. The problem is that instead of lowering down its value, k and hence the turbulence intensity increases in the X direction. You can find the case file (ready to be used) in this tar archive: https://www.dropbox.com/s/szkz4vymu9...nline.tar?dl=0 I hope that someone can find what's wrong in my setup because I couldn't... Thanks in advance! |
|
March 25, 2020, 09:11 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 6 |
Update: I tried to run the simulation with a commercial solver (starccm+), using the same grid, same BCs and, as far as it was possible, the same models.
Find the comparison in terms of TKE streamwise trend (X-direction) in the attached plot. Actually the result I got from STAR looks way more similar to what I would expect and kind of mines the reliability of OF for the application I'm dealing with. I wrote about the bug on openfoam.com bug section, they told me that will consider the thing but it will take some time. |
|
March 26, 2020, 05:47 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
|
Hi,
You do not have convergence criteria in fvSolution: Code:
SIMPLE: no convergence criteria found. Calculations will run for 2500 steps. Could you add OpenFOAM version you are using? I have tried running you case with OpenFOAM 5.x and got FPE in turbulence model on the first iteration. |
|
March 26, 2020, 06:18 |
|
#4 | |
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 6 |
Quote:
I normally do not use stopping criteria in the fvSolution file, but just check the overall residuals trend to decide when to stop. Anyway, also increasing a lot the iterations count the distribution keeps this rising trend-shape at mid-span (i.e. in the free-stream) which is totally not-realistic. The OpenFOAM version I'm using is v1912 (https://www.openfoam.com), compiled from source on my computer (OS: debian10 - testing). |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[DesignModeler] DesignModeler Scripting: How to get Full Command Access | ANT | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 53 | February 16, 2020 16:13 |
Turbulence postprocessing | Mohsin | FLUENT | 2 | October 3, 2016 15:18 |
Fan-assisted Natural Ventilation Simulation - Issues with results for an MRF case | Tellur | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | July 15, 2016 03:04 |
decay of turbulence intensity | littlelz | CFX | 3 | May 16, 2014 17:44 |
Free surface boudary conditions with SOLA-VOF | Fan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | September 9, 2006 13:24 |