|
[Sponsors] |
not physical results at the mixing plane interface. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
November 4, 2019, 12:07 |
not physical results at the mixing plane interface.
|
#1 |
New Member
Andrea
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 8 |
Hello All!
I'am dealing with turbo-machinery simulations. Reading aroud I've found that mixing-plane model is available in foam-extent long time already. As far as I understand this the so called RC2 model (see"Evaluation of an improved mixing plane interface for OpenFOAM" M Beaudoin, H Nilsson, M Page, R Magnan, H Jasak). So I have downloaded fe40 and I have tried this model on francis-99 turbine. What I get is some weird results at the mixing-plane interface. This behaviour is described in the paper I cited above, so I'am not surprising. My question is if there are any news about the development of the RC3 version of the mixing plane model? is it really necessary the RC3 version or the present model works fine and I'am just doing some mistake around? Did someone else experienced the same or similar as I do? What about the creation of hill-diagrams using OF with mixing-plane? Looking at these first simulations I'd say it is not enough accurate though I might be wrong as I don't have lot of experience. Thank you ! |
|
Tags |
foam extend 4.0, francis turbine, francis-99, mixing-plane |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Radiation in semi-transparent media with surface-to-surface model? | mpeppels | CFX | 11 | August 22, 2019 08:30 |
Different results mixing plane foam ext 3.2 & 4.0 | EnricoDeFilippi | OpenFOAM Bugs | 0 | July 29, 2018 15:52 |
[Gmsh] Nasa Nozzle: Plot 3D -->gmsh -->fluent - no physical groups | Nico89 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 1 | June 14, 2016 06:40 |
Basic Nozzle-Expander Design | karmavatar | CFX | 20 | March 20, 2016 09:44 |
Replace periodic by inlet-outlet pair | lego | CFX | 3 | November 5, 2002 21:09 |