 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
Doubts about using solver MPPIC to form stationary particle pile |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 8, 2019, 14:22
|
Doubts about using solver MPPIC to form stationary particle pile
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Fábio Morgado
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0  |
Hello,
I am trying to build my case using the solver MPPICFoam for my study case, consisting in building a small pile of ash (stationary) and verify the behavior with different flow velocity, to validate with wind tunnel experiments. I can't find much information regarding the solver online, and therefore decided to post my doubts below: 1. Is it possible to change the particles diameter? (i.e.: above 1 mm). I have been testing it, but can't see any difference in ParaView. 2. Is it possible to create an initial stationary particle pile, using the file KinematicCloudPositions? Thanks in Advance. |
|
|
|
|
|
August 11, 2023, 08:50
|
check it out
|
#2 |
|
Member
desimuser1
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 3 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
| Tags |
| ash, diameter, foam, mppic, pile |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics solver? | phsieh2005 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 7 | November 9, 2014 04:00 |
| injection problem | Mark New | FLUENT | 0 | August 4, 2013 02:30 |
| Working directory via command line | Luiz | CFX | 4 | March 6, 2011 21:02 |
| Creating New Solver: For particle-laden compressible jets | sankarv | OpenFOAM | 0 | April 4, 2010 19:06 |
| compressible two phase flow in CFX4.4 | youngan | CFX | 0 | July 2, 2003 00:32 |
Linear Mode
