|
[Sponsors] |
k and Epsilon is not converging in kEpsilon Turbulence model |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 14, 2019, 06:34 |
k and Epsilon is not converging in kEpsilon Turbulence model
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Raza Javed
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Germany
Posts: 183
Rep Power: 7 |
Hello Everyone,
I have one rectangular fluid region as you can see in the figure below: I am using simpleFoam solver and my OpenFoam version is 4.1. I am copying the case pitzDaily. First I tried to model the simple laminar flow, and that worked perfectly fine. Then I changed the flow from laminar to Turbulent. For that, to increase my Reynold's number, I increased my fluid flow. I changed the TurbulenceProperties directory, then I changed the k, Epsilon and nut files in the 0 directory. By keeping other things same, When I RUN the solver, the residuals of velocity don't converge, and also the residuals of k and Epsilon becomes very high (you can see in the error below). Code:
Time = 180 smoothSolver: Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 0.937013, Final residual = 0.0312575, No Iterations 2 smoothSolver: Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0.911587, Final residual = 0.0381164, No Iterations 2 smoothSolver: Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 0.995563, Final residual = 0.0335498, No Iterations 2 GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 2.90637e-23, Final residual = 2.90637e-23, No Iterations 0 time step continuity errors : sum local = 1.47055e+32, global = 1.9861e+20, cumulative = 2.28806e+20 smoothSolver: Solving for epsilon, Initial residual = 9.32529e-09, Final residual = 6.42063e-10, No Iterations 2 bounding epsilon, min: -1.42797e+48 max: 1.74595e+52 average: 5.31265e+47 smoothSolver: Solving for k, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 0.0858033, No Iterations 9 bounding k, min: -2.40503e+43 max: 9.54428e+48 average: 9.45471e+44 ExecutionTime = 213.94 s ClockTime = 215 s Time = 181 smoothSolver: Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 0.003325, Final residual = 0.000299627, No Iterations 1 smoothSolver: Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0.01712, Final residual = 0.000743184, No Iterations 1 smoothSolver: Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 0.0332767, Final residual = 0.00204101, No Iterations 1 #0 Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&) at ??:? #1 Foam::sigFpe::sigHandler(int) at ??:? #2 ? in "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6" #3 Foam::GAMGSolver::scale(Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::lduMatrix const&, Foam::FieldField<Foam::Field, double> const&, Foam::UPtrList<Foam::lduInterfaceField const> const&, Foam::Field<double> const&, unsigned char) const at ??:? #4 Foam::GAMGSolver::Vcycle(Foam::PtrList<Foam::lduMatrix::smoother> const&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double> const&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::PtrList<Foam::Field<double> >&, Foam::PtrList<Foam::Field<double> >&, unsigned char) const at ??:? #5 Foam::GAMGSolver::solve(Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double> const&, unsigned char) const at ??:? #6 Foam::fvMatrix<double>::solveSegregated(Foam::dictionary const&) at ??:? #7 Foam::fvMatrix<double>::solve(Foam::dictionary const&) at ??:? #8 Foam::fvMatrix<double>::solve() at ??:? #9 ? at ??:? #10 __libc_start_main in "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6" #11 ? at ??:? Floating point exception (core dumped) I don't know what mistake I am doing. Can someone please help me out in this? If you need any further information about the case, I would be happy to provide that. Thank you |
|
June 21, 2019, 03:28 |
|
#2 |
Member
Kumar
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 47
Rep Power: 13 |
It's difficult to know the reason from this picture. If you could post your case, I can take a look.
|
|
March 2, 2022, 22:34 |
|
#3 |
New Member
SunTime
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 6 |
Hello, have solve your problem? I think epsilon-based models require more demanding numreical schemes than omega-based model
|
|
Tags |
kepsilonmodel, openfoam, turbulence modelling |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question about adaptive timestepping | Guille1811 | CFX | 25 | November 12, 2017 18:38 |
Error with kepsilon Turbulence Model | Raji | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | January 29, 2017 21:01 |
realizable k epsilon turbulence model errors | bexx4444 | Main CFD Forum | 1 | March 21, 2016 04:50 |
K - epsilon VS SST turbulence model | Maicol | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 30, 2012 17:25 |
Centrifugal Pump and Turbulence Model | Michiel | CFX | 12 | January 25, 2010 04:20 |