CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

k and Epsilon is not converging in kEpsilon Turbulence model

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 14, 2019, 06:34
Default k and Epsilon is not converging in kEpsilon Turbulence model
  #1
Senior Member
 
Raza Javed
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Germany
Posts: 183
Rep Power: 7
Raza Javed is on a distinguished road
Hello Everyone,


I have one rectangular fluid region as you can see in the figure below:


I am using simpleFoam solver and my OpenFoam version is 4.1.


I am copying the case pitzDaily.


First I tried to model the simple laminar flow, and that worked perfectly fine.


Then I changed the flow from laminar to Turbulent.


For that, to increase my Reynold's number, I increased my fluid flow.



I changed the TurbulenceProperties directory, then I changed the k, Epsilon and nut files in the 0 directory.


By keeping other things same, When I RUN the solver, the residuals of velocity don't converge, and also the residuals of k and Epsilon becomes very high (you can see in the error below).


Code:
Time = 180

smoothSolver:  Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 0.937013, Final residual = 0.0312575, No Iterations 2
smoothSolver:  Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0.911587, Final residual = 0.0381164, No Iterations 2
smoothSolver:  Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 0.995563, Final residual = 0.0335498, No Iterations 2
GAMG:  Solving for p, Initial residual = 2.90637e-23, Final residual = 2.90637e-23, No Iterations 0
time step continuity errors : sum local = 1.47055e+32, global = 1.9861e+20, cumulative = 2.28806e+20
smoothSolver:  Solving for epsilon, Initial residual = 9.32529e-09, Final residual = 6.42063e-10, No Iterations 2
bounding epsilon, min: -1.42797e+48 max: 1.74595e+52 average: 5.31265e+47
smoothSolver:  Solving for k, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 0.0858033, No Iterations 9
bounding k, min: -2.40503e+43 max: 9.54428e+48 average: 9.45471e+44
ExecutionTime = 213.94 s  ClockTime = 215 s

Time = 181

smoothSolver:  Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 0.003325, Final residual = 0.000299627, No Iterations 1
smoothSolver:  Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0.01712, Final residual = 0.000743184, No Iterations 1
smoothSolver:  Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 0.0332767, Final residual = 0.00204101, No Iterations 1
#0  Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&) at ??:?
#1  Foam::sigFpe::sigHandler(int) at ??:?
#2  ? in "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6"
#3  Foam::GAMGSolver::scale(Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::lduMatrix const&, Foam::FieldField<Foam::Field, double> const&, Foam::UPtrList<Foam::lduInterfaceField const> const&, Foam::Field<double> const&, unsigned char) const at ??:?
#4  Foam::GAMGSolver::Vcycle(Foam::PtrList<Foam::lduMatrix::smoother> const&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double> const&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::PtrList<Foam::Field<double> >&, Foam::PtrList<Foam::Field<double> >&, unsigned char) const at ??:?
#5  Foam::GAMGSolver::solve(Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double> const&, unsigned char) const at ??:?
#6  Foam::fvMatrix<double>::solveSegregated(Foam::dictionary const&) at ??:?
#7  Foam::fvMatrix<double>::solve(Foam::dictionary const&) at ??:?
#8  Foam::fvMatrix<double>::solve() at ??:?
#9  ? at ??:?
#10  __libc_start_main in "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6"
#11  ? at ??:?
Floating point exception (core dumped)



I don't know what mistake I am doing.


Can someone please help me out in this? If you need any further information about the case, I would be happy to provide that.


Thank you
Attached Images
File Type: png fluid.png (5.0 KB, 21 views)
Raza Javed is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 21, 2019, 03:28
Default
  #2
Member
 
Kumar
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 47
Rep Power: 13
kishpishar is on a distinguished road
It's difficult to know the reason from this picture. If you could post your case, I can take a look.
kishpishar is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 2, 2022, 22:34
Default
  #3
New Member
 
SunTime
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 6
lpz456 is on a distinguished road
Hello, have solve your problem? I think epsilon-based models require more demanding numreical schemes than omega-based model
lpz456 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
kepsilonmodel, openfoam, turbulence modelling


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question about adaptive timestepping Guille1811 CFX 25 November 12, 2017 18:38
Error with kepsilon Turbulence Model Raji OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 January 29, 2017 21:01
realizable k epsilon turbulence model errors bexx4444 Main CFD Forum 1 March 21, 2016 04:50
K - epsilon VS SST turbulence model Maicol Main CFD Forum 0 November 30, 2012 17:25
Centrifugal Pump and Turbulence Model Michiel CFX 12 January 25, 2010 04:20


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:17.