|
[Sponsors] |
Adaptive mesh refinement and totalFlowRateAdvectiveDiffusive |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Hi all,
I am simulating the transport of a passive scalar with OpenFOAM 2.2.x. using a modified solver with adaptive mesh refinement just to check how well AMR works. There are two things I wanted to ask in case someone can help:
{ type faceSource; functionObjectLibs ("libfieldFunctionObjects.so"); enabled true; outputControl runTime; //outputTime; writeInterval 0.005; log false; valueOutput false; source patch; sourceName inlet; operation sum; fields ( phi ); } Regardless what the boundary condition is for the scalar at the inlet (fixedValue or totalFlowRateAdvectiveDiffusive) when the adaptive mesh refinement occurs then the calculated mass flow rate at the inlet is 4 times less than it should be which obviously has to do with the mesh refinement. Any ideas on how to circumvent this problem? Thanks in advance for any hint or help. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
adaptive mesh refinement |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh running killed! | Mark JIN | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 7 | June 14, 2022 01:37 |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh does not create any mesh except one for the reference cell | Arman_N | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 1 | May 20, 2019 17:16 |
[snappyHexMesh] No layers in a small gap | bobburnquist | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 6 | August 26, 2015 09:38 |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere! | sc298 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | March 27, 2011 21:11 |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh aborting | Tobi | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | November 10, 2010 03:23 |