|
[Sponsors] |
February 21, 2019, 13:59 |
olaFlow- not showing the wave
|
#1 |
Member
shima
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 58
Rep Power: 8 |
Hi
I did run my simulation with olaFlow solver and I used snappyHexMesh for generating the mesh area. when it finishes the simulation, and I want to check my initial wave which is solitary wave (I defined waveHeights, wavePeriods, wavePhases and waveDirs in waveDict), paraview doesn't show me the wave and the blocks in the flume although the folders are written in time intervals!! I do not know what is wrong with it and where I am doing wrong?? I will appreciate if anyone can help. Best, Shima. |
|
February 21, 2019, 20:07 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Pablo Higuera
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Auckland
Posts: 627
Rep Power: 19 |
Hi Shima,
this looks like an issue with ParaView rather than with olaFlow. If that is the case the OpenFOAM Post-Processing subforum would be the best fit for this thread. Did you run your case in parallel? Please note that ParaView has an option called "Case Type" that indicates the type of case that you are loading, Reconstructed (serial) or Decomposed (parallel). Have you tried running the baseWaveFlume case and visualizing it in ParaView? This should work out of the box, if not there is likely a ParaView error on your computer. Best, Pablo |
|
February 21, 2019, 20:43 |
|
#3 |
Member
shima
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 58
Rep Power: 8 |
Thank you so much for the reply,
No I did not run it parallel, I changed the wave height and it shows the wave, maybe it was because of the mesh size ... but it still does not show me the blocks and I do not know why? I will post in postprocessing page too thank you shima |
|
February 21, 2019, 20:50 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Pablo Higuera
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Auckland
Posts: 627
Rep Power: 19 |
Hi Shima,
please read this thread, it will help you provide enough information for people to respond to you. How to give enough info to get help Pablo |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[OLAFLOW] The height of wave generated by OF1806 is too small compared to theorectical wave | Robin86 | OpenFOAM Community Contributions | 5 | December 9, 2018 21:20 |
[IHFOAM] The height of wave generated by OF1806 is too small compared to theorectical wave | Robin86 | OpenFOAM Community Contributions | 0 | December 6, 2018 22:20 |
CFD in Naval Hydrodynamics, Off-Shore and Wave Modelling with OpenFOAM | hjasak | OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources | 2 | February 13, 2017 05:59 |
[waves2Foam] NWT wave generation problem | Alex song | OpenFOAM Community Contributions | 0 | April 24, 2016 05:54 |
[waves2Foam] Stokesfirst wave profile asymetrical against the still water level?? | zhxter | OpenFOAM Community Contributions | 2 | March 23, 2015 13:08 |