|
[Sponsors] |
Dual-Element Front Wing Case Using SST K-OMEGA TURBULENCE MODEL |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
January 14, 2019, 08:13 |
Dual-Element Front Wing Case Using SST K-OMEGA TURBULENCE MODEL
|
#1 |
New Member
Jesús Miguel Sánchez
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 7 |
Hello everyone!!
I have tried to run this case in ground effect. The case doesn't seem to converge and the residuals go no lower than 10^-3. I use the turbulence model SST k-omega with SIMPLE I will explain the case below: PURPOSE: To simulate the case of a FSAE dual-element front wing in ground effect. For that, the patches of the grid are: Wing = Wall Road = Wall Top = Patch Inlet = Patch Outlet = Patch The boundary conditions I use are: For U: Wing = noSlip Road = movingWallVelocity Top = inletOutlet Inlet = inletOutlet Outlet = inletOutlet For p: outletInlet for the patches with inletOutlet the boundary conditions for the wall patches are set as zeroGradient. For k and omega: I use the same boundary conditons as for the U on the patches. For the wall patches, I use fixedValue 1e-10 on the k file and omegaWallfunction (freestream value calculated from the formula) on the omega file. For the nut: all calculated, except for the wall pacthes that have fixedValue 0. This means that I am trying to solve the Boundary Layer, as that is the main functionality for this turbulence model. The problem is, as said before, that I cannot obtain good residuals with a converged solution. I have tried different y+ values from 5 to 1 (and even lower), but it doesn't work. Any idea of what the problem could be? The Reynolds number for this case is of 524000, therefore, it believe that this case shifts more towards Low-Re case than High-Re. I would like to receive some suggestion, because I have tried several things, such as using wall functions and other settings and I do not get the desired results. Thank you for your time. Best Regards PS: The grid values are: Aspect ratio: Along the wing = around 4 Skweness equiangle = around 0.6 as max, the average is 0.22 Aspect ratio = the average is around 5 but I have a maximum value of 750 due to the structured mesh for the boundary layer of the road. This cell is located very far away from the FW upstream (Near to the inlet). I use a hybrid mesh consisting of structured mesh on the road and on the wing elements and unstructured mesh along the whole rest of the grid (Advanced Front Ortho). I use also Pointwise to do this. |
|
December 14, 2020, 14:48 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Gabriel Benitez
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hey Jesus!
Did you manage to solve the problem? In my case I am studying the flow through a 2D section of a rear wing formed by two profiles. I have used AFO and T-Rex algorithm to create the mesh and I am using K-omegaSST. It happens to me like you, the simulations do not converge and I do not know what it can be. I wonder if it is due to k-omegaSST, or if it is from OpenFOAM or mesh case settings. I would appreciate your help |
|
Tags |
simple algorithm, sst k-omega, sst k-w, sst komega, yplusras |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flow over a blunt body - SST turbulence model | bharath | CFX | 5 | January 29, 2016 11:16 |
General question about SST turbulence model | Richard Renaud | CFD Freelancers | 1 | December 19, 2015 05:13 |
k omega turbulence model | sailspace | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | November 12, 2013 06:43 |
SST / turbulence model | PCFD | ANSYS | 8 | July 13, 2010 17:28 |
Free surface boudary conditions with SOLA-VOF | Fan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | September 9, 2006 13:24 |